Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Logjam Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Arts & Culture$764kEnvironment$131kEducation$61kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$5kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
MISSOULA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$25,000
SPARK ARTS IGNITE LEARNING$25,000
HOME RESOURCES$25,000
MISSOULA ART MUSEUM$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTANA PUBLIC RADIO: $100 → 9%WHITTIER SCHOOL: $100 → 10%ZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $500k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR MISSOULA PUBLIC LIBR: $50k → 9%ZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 9%MISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $10k → 9%MISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $10k → 9%MISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%ZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 9%ZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 9%HOME RESOURCES: $25k → 9%THE ROXY THEATER: $15k → 9%MISSOULA AREA YOUTH HOCKEY ASSO: $11k → 9%SUSSEX SCHOOL: $6k → 9%MISSOULA FOOD BANK: $5k → 9%SUSSEX SCHOOL: $3k → 9%MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$730k · 5 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +161% since the first grant, against +120% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$730k
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+161%
+120%

Still filing today

80%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SPARK ARTS IGNITE LEARNING
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +890% · 54% of their budget
  • MA
    MISSOULA ART MUSEUM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +161%
  • SS
    SUSSEX SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $9k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • MT
    MONTANA TROUT UNLIMITEDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $106k · revenue +153%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR MISSOULA PUBLIC LIBR
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TR
    THE ROXY THEATERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
2
The Myrna Loy

The Myrna Loy inspires the creative spirits of people in and around Helena, Montana by presenting high-quality, culturally significant films and performing arts; by supporting local and regional artists in their work; and by nurturing a…

Arts & Culture
3
Missoula Public Library Foundation

The mission of the missoula public library foundation is to advocate for the missoula public library and raise funds for library initiatives that enhance our community

Education
4
The Pulp

The Pulp is dedicated to publishing accurate and relevant news and information that informs and engages the people of Missoula and western Montana. Through our journalism we aim to promote discourse, foster civic engagement and create…

Arts & Culture
5
Missoula Area Chamber of Commerce

An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.

6
Missoula Butterfly House and Insectarium

To inspire an appreciation and understanding of insects and their relatives.

Animals
7
Missoula Midtown Foundation

Funding and conducting research on issues associated with the ongoing development, infrastructure, historical preservation, and planning of Missoula Midtown and operating educational programs to educate the public about these issues.

Community Improvement
8
Missoula Senior Citizens Center

To develop, implement, and promote programs and services that support the physical, intellectual, and emotional health and well-being of missoula's senior population.

Human Services
9
Monroe Street Arts Center

Monroe street arts center engages a community of learners in exploring the arts and developing the creative self

Arts & Culture
10
Missoula Urban Demonstration Project

MUD empowers people to build a more sustainable community through hands-on learning in our Workshops, shared resources in our Tool Library, and by providing a living example of sustainable urban living at our Demonstration Site

11
Pondera Arts Council

Providing quality live performances for the conrad area

Arts & Culture
12
Missoula Electric Cooperative Inc

Missoula Electric Cooperative, Inc. strives to uphold a commitment to service excellence, while delivering safe, affordable and reliable electricty to its members.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missoula Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Sussex School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER — $535,500 · Arts & CultureZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTERSPARK ARTS IGNITE LEARNING — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSPARK ARTS IGNITE LEARNINGMISSOULA CIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureARTS MISSOULA — $115,470 · OtherARTS MISSOULAFOUNDATION FOR MISSOULA PUBLIC LIBR — $50,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR MISSOUL…THE ROXY THEATER — $15,000 · OtherTHE ROXY THEATERMISSOULA AREA YOUTH HOCKEY ASSO — $11,150 · OtherMISSOULA AREA YOUTH HO…+4 more — $5,200 · OtherMONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED — $106,150 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA TROU…HOME RESOURCE INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentSUSSEX SCHOOL INC — $9,000 · EducationMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,120 · Food & NutritionMISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$630,500Other$196,820Recreation & Sports$106,150Environment$25,000Education$9,000Food & Nutrition$5,120Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER — $535,500 over 4y, 31% of budgetMONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED — $106,150 over 1y, 15% of budgetSPARK ARTS IGNITE LEARNING — $50,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetHOME RESOURCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMISSOULA CIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMISSOULA ART MUSEUM — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSUSSEX SCHOOL INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Missoula Community Foundation · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc · Jane S Heman Foundation Inc · James G and Marcia H Valeo Charitable Fd · Leaw Family Foundation Inc · Merlin Foundation Inc · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Logjam Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph