Skip to content

Montana · Private foundation

Logjam Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
40%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$8,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 7
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$937
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 40% of the organizations Logjam Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 43% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$40k75%
FY20245$115k40%
FY20233$36k67%
FY20221$10k0%
FY20212$6k0%
FY20203$51k67%
FY20197$80k57%
FY20187$680kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$764kEnvironment$131kEducation$61kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$5kCommunity Improvement$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Logjam Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Zootown Arts Community Center$535,500431%
Montana Trout Unlimited$106,150115%
Spark Arts Ignite Learning$75,000354%
Missoula Civic Symphony Association$25,00012%
Home Resource Inc$25,00014%
Missoula Art Museum$20,00021%
The Roxy Theater$15,0001n/a
Sussex School Inc$9,00020%
Missoula Food Bank & Community Center$5,12010%
Missoula Downtown Foundation Inc$5,00012%
Bare Bait Dance$4,12511%
The University of Montana Foundation$3,00010%
Missoula County Public Schools$2,0001n/a

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($188k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Logjam Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZootown Arts Community Center: $535,500 over 4y, 31% of budgetMontana Trout Unlimited: $106,150 over 1y, 15% of budgetSpark Arts Ignite Learning: $75,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetMissoula Civic Symphony Association: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHome Resource Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMissoula Art Museum: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSussex School Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMissoula Food Bank & Community Center: $5,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMissoula Downtown Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBare Bait Dance: $4,125 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe University of Montana Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Missoula Community Foundation · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc · Jane S Heman Foundation Inc · James G and Marcia H Valeo Charitable Fd · Leaw Family Foundation Inc · Merlin Foundation Inc · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Logjam Foundation with peer funders

About Logjam Foundation

How much does Logjam Foundation give?
Logjam Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $40,125 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 7 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Logjam Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (78%), Environment (13%), Education (6%).
Who are Logjam Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Zootown Arts Community Center ($536k), Montana Trout Unlimited ($106k), Spark Arts Ignite Learning ($75k).
Does Logjam Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 40% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Logjam Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Logjam Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation, Montana Community Foundation Inc, Missoula Community Foundation.
Where is Logjam Foundation based?
Logjam Foundation is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Logjam’s filings →

More from the funding graph