Skip to content
Loconti Family Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Loconti Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.8M
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$190,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY$190,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTHERN GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS: $6k → 9%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $50k → 9%NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE: $25k → 9%CVHS: $75k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $275k → 10%BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $13k → 11%KINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTER: $50k → 12%ELIZABETH H BROWN HUMANE SOCIETY IN: $38k → 12%GREEN MOUNTAIN PUG RESCUE: $30k → 12%UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $75k → 10%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 9%NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE: $25k → 9%CVHS: $30k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $190k → 10%KINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTER: $25k → 12%ELIZABETH BROWN HUMANE SOCIETY: $7k → 12%UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 10%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $12k → 9%NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE: $15k → 9%CENTRAL VERMONT HUMANE SOCIETY: $30k → 9%PASSION FOR PAWS: $45k → 10%BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $13k → 11%KINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTER: $8k → 12%RIVERSIDE RESCUE: $71k → 12%UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 10%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $12k → 9%NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE: $15k → 9%CVHS: $30k → 9%PASSION 4 PAWS: $40k → 10%RIVERSIDE RESCUE: $70k → 12%RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $45k → 12%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $12k → 9%NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE: $10k → 9%PASSION FOR PAWS: $25k → 10%FRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 12%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $12k → 9%PASSION FOR PAWS: $25k → 10%ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 9%PASSION FOR PAWS: $20k → 10%A CANINE GEM RESCUE: $17k → 10%ALL BREED RESCUE: $64k → 10%ALL BREED RESCUE: $35k → 10%VERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE: $35k → 10%ALL BREED RESCUE: $27k → 10%VERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE: $26k → 10%ALL BREED RESCUE INC: $15k → 10%VERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE: $11k → 10%VERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 15 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$1.6M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
-3%

Still filing today

73%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $465k · revenue +29%
  • RR
    RIVERSIDE RESCUE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $142k · revenue +127% · 30% of their budget
  • AC
    ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $133k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • RC
    RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue -24%
  • P4
    Passion 4 Paws Company
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue -3%
  • CV
    CENTRAL VERMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
3
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Union County Inc

The Humane Society of Union County exists to reduce the number of abused, abandoned, and neglected cats and dogs through rescue, rehabilitation, adoption, and spay and neuter.

Animals
5
Raskels Rescue
Animals
6
Countryside Animal Rescue Inc

Rescuing rehabilitating and housing of abandoned and homeless dogs cats and small animals with the mission of finding them new forever homes

Animals
7
Rescue Coop
Animals
8
Vt Dog Rescue

We rescue and rehabilitate homeless dogs and place them in loving homes

Animals
9
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
10
Beagle Haven Rescue & Hospice Inc

Organization is a dog rescue. Accepts dogs from shelters or owner surrenders, provides appropriate veterinary care, and adopts dogs out.

—
11
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
12
Mineral County Humane Society Inc

rescue-spay-neuter and adopt into forever homes

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monadnock Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vermont English Bulldog Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $465,200 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTYRIVERSIDE RESCUE INC: $141,671 · AnimalsRIVERSIDE RESCUE INCADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND: $133,000 · AnimalsADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUNDUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $125,000 · AnimalsUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INCNORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $90,000 · AnimalsNORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE INCKINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTERINC: $87,500 · AnimalsKINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTERINCVERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE INC: $82,936 · AnimalsVERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE INC+9 more: $242,308 · Animals+9 moreALL BREED RESCUE INC: $140,255 · OtherALL BREED RESCUE INCCVHS: $135,000 · OtherCVHSPASSION FOR PAWS: $115,000 · OtherPASSION FOR PAWSELIZABETH H BROWN HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $44,560 · OtherELIZABETH H BROWN HUMANE SO…+2 more: $5,500 · Other
Animals$1,367,615Other$440,315

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $465,200 over 2y, 14% of budgetRIVERSIDE RESCUE INC: $141,671 over 3y, 30% of budgetALL BREED RESCUE INC: $140,255 over 4y, 12% of budgetADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND: $133,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $125,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $90,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetKINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTERINC: $87,500 over 4y, 24% of budgetVERMONT ENGLISH BULLDOG RESCUE INC: $82,936 over 4y, 14% of budgetRUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $45,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPassion 4 Paws Company: $40,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN PUG RESCUE: $40,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetCENTRAL VERMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetBennington County Humane Society Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFranklin County Humane Society: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,308 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…Community Bank Na Fou…National Life Group C…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…The Irving and Phylli…Pedigree FoundationThe Duffield Family F…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodThe Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Community Bank Na Foundation of New England Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · The Irving and Phyllis Millstein Foundation for Animal Welfare Ltd · Pedigree Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loconti Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loconti Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loconti Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home