Skip to content
Livingston Sunrise Rotary Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Livingston Sunrise Rotary Foundation

The mission of our foundation is to enable rotarians and friends of the foundation to advance understanding, goodwill and peace through the improvements of health, the support of education and the alleviation of poverty.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$131kYouth Development$118kFood & Nutrition$66kEmployment$30kHousing & Shelter$25kHealth$25kInternational$9k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,654
Median grant
1
States reached
$381k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VINA COMMUNITY DENTAL CENTER$25,000
LIV COUNTY UNITED WAY-HUNGER COUNC$16,654
NORTH STAR REACH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REACHING HIGHER INC: $66k → 5%Reaching Higher Inc: $20k → 5%LIVINSTON CO CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $25k → 5%Livingston County Catholic Charities: $20k → 5%The Livingston Family Center Inc: $25k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$197k · 3 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$197k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    REACHING HIGHER INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $86k · revenue +17%
  • LC
    LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $66k · revenue -19%
  • LC
    LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    2× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LY
    LESA YOUTH INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $83k
  • T1
    TORCH 180graduated
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +43%
  • LC
    LIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Living Center Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.

—
2
Livingston Family Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurse Association

Livingston provides a variety of home health services ranging from rehabilitative care to hospice care of the highest quality in the most cost-effective manner to residents of ventura county.

Health
4
The Arc Livingston

We exist to assist families and individuals with developmental disabilities by providing support, information and advocacy.

—
5
Livingston Foundation Inc
—
6
Living Services Inc
—
7
Severe Weather Network Livingston County

The Severe Weather Network (SWN) partners with community organizations, agencies, and faith communities to provide emergency, overnight refuge during the winter months for people experiencing homelessness in Livingston County. SWN also…

—
8
United Way of Livingston County

To improve peoples lives by mobilizing the carepower of our community.

—
9
Lansing Housing Corporation

Thornton manor is a skilled nursing facility dedicated to enriching the quality of life of each individual resident.

—
10
Looking Glass Community Services

Looking glass provides counseling, residential treatment, education, vocational training, as well as shelter and case management to children, youth and adults.

Human Services
11
Retired & Senior Volunteer Program of Ingham Eaton and Clinton

Encourage, advocate and place adults 55 and older in volunteer opportunties by using their time, talents and skills to help address the needs of the community.

Philanthropy
12
Livingston Community Health

To provide comprehensive primary and preventive health care services to all patients regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingston County Catholic Charities; the most unlike its peers is Torch 180. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REACHING HIGHER INC: $86,000 · Human ServicesREACHING HIGHER INCLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $45,000 · Human ServicesLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIESTHE LIVINGSTON FAMILY CENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIVINGSTON FAMILY CENTER INCLESA YOUTH INITIATIVE: $83,000 · OtherLESA YOUTH INITIATIVELIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $25,000 · OtherLIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR …LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $65,673 · PhilanthropyLIVINGSTON COUNTY …TORCH 180: $30,000 · EmploymentVINA COMMUNITY DENTAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthNORTH STAR REACH: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,605 · International
Human Services$156,000Other$108,000Philanthropy$65,673Employment$30,000Health$25,000Youth Development$10,000International$8,605

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREACHING HIGHER INC: $86,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $65,673 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTORCH 180: $30,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetVINA COMMUNITY DENTAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetTHE LIVINGSTON FAMILY CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,605 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Livingston County Uni…Ted and Jane Von Voig…DTE Energy FoundationAnn Arbor SparkThe Pfizer Foundation…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Livingston County United WayMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Livingston County United Way · Ted and Jane Von Voigtlander Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Ann Arbor Spark · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Livingston Sunrise Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Livingston Sunrise Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Livingston Sunrise Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home