Skip to content

Tennessee · Public charity

Living Water Project

The Living Water Project is an effort to fund clean and accessible water for people in impoverished areas of the world, thereby also extending to them the love of God.

$549k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
29%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$261k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$44,723
Largest grant, FY2025
$92,680
Organizations funded a year
5 to 7
FY2020 to FY2024
Total assets, FY2025
$236k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations Living Water Project funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$261k0%
FY20247$330k29%
FY20235$353k0%
FY20227$207k14%
FY20215$417k20%
FY20205$189kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$852kReligion$401kHuman Services$374kEducation$46kPhilanthropy$43kHealth$20kEnvironment$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Final Command Ministries$677,180611%
Water4 Inc$415,62261%
Zambia Christian College Inc dba Zambia Mission Fund$319,84262%
Lipscomb University$136,00050%
Exile International Inc$101,21952%
Invite Joy - Burkina Faso Inc$43,3842n/a
OneWorld Health$38,00030%
Made in the Streets$13,00011%
Living Water International$12,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Living Water Project supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFinal Command Ministries: $677,180 over 6y, 11% of budgetWater4 Inc: $415,622 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetZambia Christian College Inc dba Zambia Mission Fund: $319,842 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetLipscomb University: $136,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetExile International Inc: $101,219 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetOneWorld Health: $38,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMade in the Streets: $13,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLiving Water International: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Living Water Project with peer funders

About Living Water Project

How much does Living Water Project give?
Living Water Project reported 6 itemized grants totaling $260,545, out of $549,192 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 7 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Living Water Project fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (49%), Religion (23%), Human Services (21%).
Who are Living Water Project's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Final Command Ministries ($677k), Water4 Inc ($416k), Zambia Christian College Inc dba Zambia Mission Fund ($320k).
Does Living Water Project fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Living Water Project?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Servant Foundation, Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund, Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc.
Where is Living Water Project based?
Living Water Project is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Living Water Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph