Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Liveonny Foundation

To promote, advance and inspire organ, eye, and tissue donation through its relationships with clinical partners, with individuals, and with families who donate or receive the gift of life.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.9MHuman Services$57kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,485 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,485 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIFT OF LIFE FAMILY TRANSPORT$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ONELEGACY: $10k → 14%NY CENTER FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: $200k → 7%COGENT COMMUNICATION: $25k → 9%GIFT OF LIFE FAMILY TRANSPORT: $10k → 11%NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $100k → 17%HORACE MOORE CO CHIONESU BAKARI: $27k → 20%LIFEGIFT ORGAN DONATION CENTER: $10k → 16%LIFELINK FOUNDATION LIFE LINK OF PUERTO RICO: $10k → 13%GIFT OF LIFE FAMILY TRANSPORT: $10k → 13%NY CENTER FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: $12k → 7%AMERICAN LIVER FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%GIFT OF LIFE FAMILY TRANSPORT: $10k → 13%HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $325k → 17%HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $265k → 17%HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $265k → 17%HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $250k → 17%HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 4 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$1.7M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+35%

Still filing today

75%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +125% · 47% of their budget
  • NY
    NEW YORK CENTER FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $212k · revenue +10%
  • TH
    The Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai
    2× · 2019–2020 · $57k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • NL
    NYU LANGONE HOSPITALSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +28%
  • EA
    EFFECTIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $57k
  • HM
    HORACE MOORE CO CHIONESU BAKARI
    one grant, 2021 · $27k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Delaware Valley Society of Transplant Surgeons

Gift of life donor program, the tax-exempt non-profit federally designated organization serving the eastern half of pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and delaware, is responsible for recovering and allocating organs and tissues used in…

Health
2
Midwest Transplant Network Inc

Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.

Health
3
Gift of Hope Organ & Tissue Donor Network

To save and enhance the lives of as many people as possible through organ and tissue donation.

Health
4
Give Life Ny
Health
5
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

6
Southern Legacy of Life

We restore lives through the recovery of organs and tissue.

Health
7
Joanne Barr Mem Liver Transplant Found
8
Ultimate Gift of Life Foundation

The ultimate gift of life foundation's mission is to increase awareness through education of the benefits of organ and tissue donation and to register individuals as organ donors.

Health
9
Transplant Foundation Inc
Health
10
New York Cardiothoracic Transplant Consortium Inc

To bring together heart and lung transplant professionals dedicated to collaboration, data sharing and peer review to enhance the quality of heart and lung transplant services.

Health
11
Las Cruces Transplant Group

To educate and assist the community regarding organ and tissue donation.

12
New Jersey Organ and Tissue Shrg Ntwk

Through organ and tissue donation and transplantation, the organization saves lives, gives hope and restores physical function. please refer to schedule o for the organization's community benefit statement.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Onelegacy and the most unlike its peers is Gift of Life Family Transport Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION INC — $1,430,000 · HealthHARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION INCNEW YORK CENTER FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION INC — $211,890 · HealthNEW YORK CENTER FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION INCNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $100,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS+5 more — $96,600 · HealthEFFECTIVE ARTS — $56,704 · OtherHORACE MOORE CO CHIONESU BAKARI — $26,562 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $24,650 · OtherGift of Life Family Transport LTD — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Health$1,838,490Other$107,916Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARBORING HEARTS HOUSING FOUNDATION INC — $1,430,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetNEW YORK CENTER FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION INC — $211,890 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai — $56,600 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLIFEGIFT ORGAN DONATION CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINK FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONELEGACY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Liveonny Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Lifelink Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Liveonny Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Liveonny Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph