Skip to content
Little Dixie Community Action Agency Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Little Dixie Community Action Agency Inc

To improve the lives of low-income individuals and families through service and collaboration leading to self-sufficiency.

$29k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$312kHuman Services$86kCommunity Improvement$50kEducation$15k
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,371
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Opportunities Inc$15,371
INCA Community Services$13,462
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%Big Five Community Services: $11k → 16%Delta Comm Action Fdn: $15k → 17%United Community Action Prog: $17k → 17%Northeast OK Comm Action Fdn: $28k → 18%Deep Fork Comm Action Fdn: $21k → 19%KiBois Community Action Fdn: $18k → 21%INCA Community Services: $33k → 21%Northeast OK Comm Action Fdn: $27k → 18%INCA Community Services: $24k → 21%INCA Community Services: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 5 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$300k
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $71k · revenue +61%
  • SO
    SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $45k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • WV
    WASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue -7%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +26%
  • DF
    DEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION I
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action of Southern Kentucky Inc

We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.

—
2
Ozark Action Inc

To coordinate and provide services for people with needs so they can improve their quality of life.

Human Services
3
Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation

Alleviating the causes and conditions of poverty in a ten county area of Southwest Missouri.

Human Services
4
Community Action Agency Inc

To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

Human Services
5
Community Action Agency of South Central Michigan

Community action is dedicated to helping people achieve and maintain independence. the fulfillment of the mission is guided by the core values of service, caring and action.

Human Services
6
Allegan County Resource Development Committee Inc

Community Action of Allegan County will serve, advocate, and engage individuals, families, and communities to overcome the effects of poverty and encourage self-reliance.

Human Services
7
Community Action Agency of South Alabama Inc

Administration of federal, state and local awards and grants for the poverty sector of a 7 county area in alabama, providing headstart education, food, shelter, maintenance, and weatherization programs.

—
8
Community Action Agency of Northwest Alabama Inc

Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.

—
9
Community Action of South Mississippi

Provide quality services that empowers the community and fosters independence.

Human Services
10
Csra Economic Opportunity Authority

Community action agency established to promote self-sufficiency among individuals, children, and families with low income by providing self-help opportunities through housing, employment, and other supporting services.

—
11
Community Action Region Vi

Community action region vi's mission is to improve the quality of life for low income, elderly, & disabled people in a nine county area, to promote public awareness of the needs and problems faced by these individuals, and to work towards…

Housing & Shelter
12
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Great Plains Improvement Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $71,026 · Human ServicesINCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INCNORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $55,112 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCWASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $22,181 · Human ServicesWASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCILDEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION I: $20,531 · Human ServicesDEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION IKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION: $17,763 · Human ServicesKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATIONUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $17,477 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INCDELTA COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $14,906 · Human ServicesDELTA COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INCBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $11,116 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $44,608 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION DEV…COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN: $21,700 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION RES…GREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $19,034 · OtherGREAT PLAINS IMPROVE…OPPORTUNITIES INC: $78,872 · EducationOPPORTUNITIES INCSOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU: $50,221 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST OKLAHO…COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $19,165 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVELO…
Human Services$230,112Other$85,342Education$78,872Community Improvement$69,386

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPPORTUNITIES INC: $78,872 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetINCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $71,026 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $55,112 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU: $50,221 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $44,608 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $22,181 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN: $21,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION I: $20,531 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $19,165 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $19,034 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION: $17,763 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $17,477 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $14,906 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $11,116 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma Association …Regional Food Bank of…Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma Association of Community ActionOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma Association of Community Action · Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Little Dixie Community Action Agency Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Little Dixie Community Action Agency Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Big Five Community Services Inc: 75% of income from government
  • United Community Action Program Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Community Action Resource and Developmen: 62% of income from government
  • Delta Community Action Foundation Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Northeast Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Southwest Oklahoma Community Action Grou: 38% of income from government
  • Inca Community Services Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Washita Valley Community Action Council: 25% of income from government
  • Community Action Development Corporation: 22% of income from government
  • Ki Bois Community Action Foundation: 10% of income from government
  • Opportunities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Little Dixie Community Action Agency’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home