Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Little Dixie Community Action Agency Inc

To improve the lives of low-income individuals and families through service and collaboration leading to self-sufficiency.

$29k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.

Health$312kHuman Services$86kCommunity Improvement$50kEducation$15k
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,371
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Opportunities Inc$15,371
INCA Community Services$13,462
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%Big Five Community Services: $11k → 16%Delta Comm Action Fdn: $15k → 17%United Community Action Prog: $17k → 17%Northeast OK Comm Action Fdn: $28k → 18%Deep Fork Comm Action Fdn: $21k → 19%KiBois Community Action Fdn: $18k → 21%INCA Community Services: $33k → 21%Northeast OK Comm Action Fdn: $27k → 18%INCA Community Services: $24k → 21%INCA Community Services: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$300k · 5 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$300k
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $71k · revenue +61%
  • SO
    SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $45k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • WV
    WASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue -7%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +26%
  • DF
    DEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION Igraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action of Southern Kentucky Inc

We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.

—
2
Ozark Action Inc

To coordinate and provide services for people with needs so they can improve their quality of life.

Human Services
3
Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation

Alleviating the causes and conditions of poverty in a ten county area of Southwest Missouri.

Human Services
4
Community Action Agency Inc

To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

Human Services
5
Allegan County Resource Development Committee Inc

Community Action of Allegan County will serve, advocate, and engage individuals, families, and communities to overcome the effects of poverty and encourage self-reliance.

Human Services
6
Community Action Agency of Northwest Alabama Inc

Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.

—
7
Community Action Agency of South Alabama Inc

Administration of federal, state and local awards and grants for the poverty sector of a 7 county area in alabama, providing headstart education, food, shelter, maintenance, and weatherization programs.

—
8
Community Action of South Mississippi

Provide quality services that empowers the community and fosters independence.

Human Services
9
Csra Economic Opportunity Authority

Community action agency established to promote self-sufficiency among individuals, children, and families with low income by providing self-help opportunities through housing, employment, and other supporting services.

—
10
Community Action Region Vi

Community action region vi's mission is to improve the quality of life for low income, elderly, & disabled people in a nine county area, to promote public awareness of the needs and problems faced by these individuals, and to work towards…

Housing & Shelter
11
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
12
Pinebelt-Multi-Purpose Community Action Agency Inc

Service to the needy Headstart, Utility Assistance, Transportation, and Housing Assistance.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Great Plains Improvement Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $71,026 · Human ServicesINCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INCNORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $55,112 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCWASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL — $22,181 · Human ServicesWASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCILDEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION I — $20,531 · Human ServicesDEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION IKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION — $17,763 · Human ServicesKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATIONUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $17,477 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INCDELTA COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC — $14,906 · Human ServicesDELTA COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INCBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $11,116 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $44,608 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION DEV…COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN — $21,700 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION RES…GREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $19,034 · OtherGREAT PLAINS IMPROVE…OPPORTUNITIES INC — $78,872 · EducationOPPORTUNITIES INCSOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU — $50,221 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST OKLAHO…COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO — $19,165 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVELO…
Human Services$230,112Other$85,342Education$78,872Community Improvement$69,386

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPPORTUNITIES INC — $78,872 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetINCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $71,026 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $55,112 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU — $50,221 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $44,608 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWASHITA VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL — $22,181 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN — $21,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEEP FORK COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION I — $20,531 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO — $19,165 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $19,034 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION — $17,763 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $17,477 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC — $14,906 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $11,116 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma Association …Regional Food Bank of…Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma Association of Community ActionOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma Association of Community Action · Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Little Dixie Community Action Agency Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Big Five Community Services Inc — 75% of income from government
  • United Community Action Program Inc — 62% of income from government
  • Community Action Resource and Developmen — 62% of income from government
  • Delta Community Action Foundation Inc — 57% of income from government
  • Northeast Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Southwest Oklahoma Community Action Grou — 38% of income from government
  • Inca Community Services Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Washita Valley Community Action Council — 25% of income from government
  • Community Action Development Corporation — 22% of income from government
  • Ki Bois Community Action Foundation — 10% of income from government
  • Opportunities Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home