Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lisette and Michael Farrell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$217kArts & Culture$42kHousing & Shelter$41kReligion$40kHuman Services$33kHealth$18kFood & Nutrition$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$25,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$25,000
LAS PATRONAS$7,500
MARY STAR OF THE SEA$5,500
MILES CHRISTI$3,000
THE GIVENGAIN FOUNDATION$500
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$342k · 10 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$342k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $75k · revenue +12%
  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $41k · revenue +32%
  • TS
    THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $28k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CD
    CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY WOMEN'S AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TC
    THE CENTER'S YOUNG PROFESSIONALS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
3
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
Associated Students of San Diego State University

To support the social, recreational, cultural and education programs and facilities, both on campus and in the community, and to advocate for student interests, provide leadership opportunities and participate in shared governance.

—
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
11
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities Diocese of San Diego. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP SCHOOL: $116,835 · OtherBISHOP SCHOOLMARY STAR OF THE SEA: $19,500 · OtherMARY STAR OF THE SEALAS PATRONAS: $18,800 · OtherLAS PATRONASMILES CHRISTI: $18,750 · OtherMILES CHRISTIJUST REMEMBER CORPORATION: $6,900 · Other+7 more: $14,505 · Other+7 moreTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $75,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEUniversity of Chicago: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $27,500 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIE…THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $14,600 · Arts & CultureTHEATER & A…ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $41,000 · ReligionST VINCENT …CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $15,000 · HealthCUREBOUND: $1,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 · Human ServicesRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $1,600 · PhilanthropyGivenGain Foundation USA: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $200 · PhilanthropyVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$195,290Education$100,000Arts & Culture$42,100Religion$41,000Health$16,000Human Services$2,500Philanthropy$2,300Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $41,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAS PATRONAS: $18,800 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $14,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farrell Family FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farrell Family Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lisette and Michael Farrell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lisette and Michael Farrell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lisette and Michael Farrell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lisette and Michael Farrell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lisette and Michael Farrell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph