Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lisa and Maury Friedman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$266kInternational$98kEnvironment$82kPhilanthropy$77kArts & Culture$66kHuman Services$33kCommunity Improvement$29kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $59k
$285
Median grant
9
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IKAR$48,798
Shalom Institute Camp and Conferenc$10,415
J Give$8,900
Community Partners$5,075
Liberty Hill Foundation$5,000
ADAMAH$2,655
ADVOT$2,500
DAYENY$2,000
Friends of Arava Institute$2,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$1,000
SHEMESH INSTITUTE$373
GoFundMe$285
Streets Are For Everyone$274
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATION CENTER OF$155
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK$107
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Solidarity STL: $1k → 21%Swipe Out Hunger: $100 → 14%Tides Center: $500 → 10%Legacy Ladies Inc: $1k → 14%Legacy Ladies Inc: $1k → 14%Jewish Center for Justice: $118 → 14%Conejo Valley Friendship Circle: $10k → 14%Conejo Valley Friendship Circle: $10k → 14%Conejo Valley Friendship Circle: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 37 repeat orgs$297k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
61

Total granted

$513k
$289k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-35%
+56%

Still filing today

49%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +88%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +169%
  • JF
    JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK
    3× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $255k
  • AF
    American Friends of the Heschel Cen
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • J
    JUMPSTART
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jumpstart Labs Inc Dba Jewish Jumpstart Jslabs

To develop, strengthen, and learn from nonprofit, philanthropic, public, as well as other projects, organizations, and networks that benefit society by advancing civic engagement, community-building, culture, education, religion, service,…

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
6
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
7
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
8
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
10
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
11
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
12
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network; the most unlike its peers is Ho Chou Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
35/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $255,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIKAR: $198,176 · OtherIKARJ Give: $56,200 · OtherJ GiveSinfonietta Paris Chamber Orchestra: $27,745 · OtherWE STORIES: $23,686 · Other+90 more: $116,939 · Other+90 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $91,800 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWM…LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $30,493 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUN…CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,040 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUN…JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $11,175 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NE…+3 more: $670 · PhilanthropySHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $44,901 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CONEJO VALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesEverstrong Prevention: $5,517 · Human ServicesLEGACY LADIES INC: $2,080 · Human Services+4 more: $1,718 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $28,298 · Community Improvement+1 more: $107 · Community ImprovementSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $6,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $5,104 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,100 · EducationPARENT REVOLUTION INC: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $150 · EducationWilderness Torah: $7,500 · EnvironmentProject Regeneration: $5,707 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $2,000 · Environment+1 more: $200 · Environment
Other$677,746Philanthropy$149,178Youth Development$44,901Human Services$34,315Community Improvement$28,405Education$21,854Environment$15,407

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $91,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $44,901 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $30,493 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $28,298 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONEJO VALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetWE STORIES: $23,686 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $11,175 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFJC: $10,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $10,204 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWilderness Torah: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLupita Project: $7,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FARM SCHOOL: $6,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetProject Regeneration: $5,707 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEverstrong Prevention: $5,517 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $5,104 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARENT REVOLUTION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $3,603 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetADVOT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY LADIES INC: $2,080 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAZON INC: $1,529 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOLIDARITY STL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $498 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE: $472 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPollinator Partnership: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN HARVEST STL: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Center for Justice: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTIVALA INC: $107 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTorrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWIPE OUT HUNGER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds THE CONEJO VALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WE STORIES ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FJC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Wilderness Torah ↗
  • Who funds Lupita Project ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FARM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Project Regeneration ↗
  • Who funds Everstrong Prevention ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARENT REVOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVOT ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY LADIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD ↗
  • Who funds HAZON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Covenant Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Upstart Bay Area · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Joyce and Irving Goldman Family Foundation Inc · Houston Jewish Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lisa and Maury Friedman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lisa and Maury Friedman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lisa and Maury Friedman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lisa and Maury Friedman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lisa and Maury Friedman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph