Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2017
34
Grants FY2017
33
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 21 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2017
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$2,074,383
States reached, FY2017
7
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hillel Council of New England Inc$10,00011%
Maimonides School$9,0001n/a
The Second Step Inc$6,5001n/a
Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc$5,00010%
Lupus Foundation of New England Inc$5,00012%
Congregation Etz Chaim Inc$4,5001n/a
Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc$4,20010%
Ahavath Torah Congregation$3,8001n/a
Impactisrael Inc$3,00010%
American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot$2,0001n/a
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hillel Council of New England Inc$10,00011%
Maimonides School$9,0001n/a
The Second Step Inc$6,5001n/a
Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc$5,00010%
Lupus Foundation of New England Inc$5,00012%
Congregation Etz Chaim Inc$4,5001n/a
Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc$4,20010%
Ahavath Torah Congregation$3,8001n/a
Impactisrael Inc$3,00010%
American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot$2,0001n/a
Americans for Peace and Tolerance Inc$2,00010%
Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc$2,00010%
Temple Emanuel of Newton$2,0001n/a
National Council of Young Israel$1,5001n/a
Israel Emergency Alliance$1,50010%
The Sato Project$1,50010%
Pine Street Inn Inc$1,00010%
American Congress for Truth Inc$1,00010%
Boston Friends of Yad Ezrah Inc$1,0001n/a
Children's Hospital Corporation$1,00010%
Yeshivat Maale Gilboa USA Inc$50010%

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($44k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHillel Council of New England Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLupus Foundation of New England Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetJewish Family & Children's Service Inc: $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImpactisrael Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmericans for Peace and Tolerance Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCommittee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsrael Emergency Alliance: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Sato Project: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPine Street Inn Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Congress for Truth Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivat Maale Gilboa USA Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation with peer funders

About Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation

How much does Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation give?
Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation reported 34 grants totaling $2,186,383 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Philanthropy (95%), Religion (2%), Health (1%).
Who are Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Hillel Council of New England Inc ($10k), Maimonides School ($9k), The Second Step Inc ($7k).
Does Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc, Jewish Communal Fund, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation based?
Lipsky Fred & Sarah Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lipsky Fred & Sarah’s filings →

More from the funding graph