Skip to content

· Public charity

Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown

Lions club of oklahoma city, downtown mission is to promote the betterment of the oklahoma city community.

$86k
Granted FY2019
10
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$21k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

76% of Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $70k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
7
’18
8
’19
11
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$620kEducation$242kHealth$182kYouth Development$106kFood & Nutrition$74kRecreation & Sports$31kHuman Services$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $69,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $86,079 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,479 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEED THE CHILDREN$21,000
NEW VIEW OKLAHOMA$15,000
LIONS CLUB OF OKC DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC$7,600
SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY$6,000
NEW VIEW OKLAHOMA$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
THE HOYT FOUNDATION INC$5,000
OKLAHOMA LIONS EYE BANK$1,000
OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH$1,000
CAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE HOYT FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 17%CELEBRATING TOGETHER INC: $100k → 13%LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE (FORMERLY LIONS BOYS RANCH)-BUILDING FUND & SUPPORT: $101k → 19%THE HOYT FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%RED ANDREWS CHRISTMAS DINNER FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH: $1k → 19%OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH: $1k → 19%OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH: $1k → 19%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $6k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $6k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $6k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lions International Oklahoma City Downtownlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$319k · 9 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$319k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+29%

Still filing today

78%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEmploymentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $104k · revenue +155%
  • HF
    HOYT FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $12k · revenue +100%
  • OL
    OKLAHOMA LIONS SIGHT CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY OK - PARKS DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • LC
    Lions Clubs International Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +29%
  • OD
    OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lions Clubten Sleep Hyattville

To empower lions clubs, volunteer, and partners to improve health and well-being, strengthen communities, and support those in need through humanitarian services and grants that impact lives globally, and encourage peace and international…

—
2
Utah Lions Foundation

Promote vision health and disease prevention

—
3
Oklahoma Blood Institute

Oklahoma blood institute's (obi) mission is to be the donor-to-patient lifeline by providing our communities and medical partners security by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health
4
Lions Eye Bank of Texas

To promote sight restoration and prevention of blindness.

Health
5
Cleats for Kids Foundation

C4k empowers kids to live healthier lifestyles and learn life lessons through sports by providing sports shoes and safe equipment to kids in need. it is a unique, one-of-a-kind mission in our community. in 2024, c4k collected $1,118,705 of…

Human Services
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Oklahoma Lions Service Foundation Inc

To raise money by conducting varous fundraising projects and receiving contributions to provide funds for the oklahoma lions boys ranch, oklahoma lions eye bank, and other oklahoma lions' service programs. the foundation also operates a…

—
8
Lions Eye Bank of Nebraska Inc

Eye tissue retrieval, processing, distribution, and research

Community Improvement
9
Bartlesville Lions Charities Inc

The Bartlesville Lions Charities Inc is a service organization doing community volunteer activities in Bartlesville Oklahoma

—
10
Hawaii Lions Foundation

Hlf-mission: the hawaii lions foundation serves as a charitable tax exempt organization that promotes programs towards improving and expanding services to sight and hearing-impaired persons while enhancing the image of lionism throughout…

Community Improvement
11
Mission Lions Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to impact the lives of millions of people by extending a network of care by participating in four service action campaigns; sight conservation for children, sight conservation for adults, community eye…

Philanthropy
12
Gift of Sight Inc

1. Our volunteers and paid staff visit schools to conduct initial vision screenings, identifying children who need further evaluation and care. 2. We arrange for ophthalmologists to visit schools and provide professional eye examinations,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Celebrating Together Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $805,421 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $104,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS R…Celebrating Together Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesCelebrating Together …SKYLINE URBAN OUTREACH INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesSKYLINE URBAN OUTREAC…HOYT FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesLIONS CLUB OF OKC DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $35,900 · OtherCITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY OK - PARKS DEPARTMENT: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherMETRO TECHNOLOGY CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Other+4 more: $6,750 · OtherFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $73,500 · InternationalNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $51,000 · EmploymentOKLAHOMA LIONS SIGHT CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · Health
Philanthropy$807,421Human Services$242,000Other$90,650International$73,500Employment$51,000Health$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $805,421 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $104,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCelebrating Together Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $73,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $51,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIONS CLUB OF OKC DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $35,900 over 3y, 59% of budgetHOYT FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMETRO TECHNOLOGY CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA LIONS SIGHT CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown?

Find your warmest path to Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lions International Oklahoma City Downtown’s filings →

More from the funding graph