Skip to content

· Public charity

Lions Club International Lexington Lions Club Inc

Promote the theory and practice of the principles of good government and good citizenship and to take an active interest in the civic, social and moral welfare of the community.

$249k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$805kHuman Services$106kReligion$58kHealth$52kRecreation & Sports$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $202,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $248,520 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,020 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $128k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEXINGTON LIONS CLUB ENDOWMENT INC$127,500
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$18,000
ITN BLUEGRASS$12,000
STEP BY STEP$10,000
UNSHACKLED BY LOVE MINISTRIES$10,000
ENVISION BLIND SPORTS$10,000
A CARING PLACE$8,000
KENTUCKY LIONS EYE FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $10k → 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 8%STEP BY STEP: $11k → 15%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $8k → 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $17k → 8%STEP BY STEP: $10k → 15%BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $10k → 15%A CARING PLACE: $8k → 15%A CARING PLACE: $8k → 15%A CARING PLACE: $6k → 15%ITN BLUEGRASS: $12k → 15%A CARING PLACE: $6k → 15%ITN BLUEGRASS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 8 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

88%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LEXINGTON LIONS CLUB ENDOWMENT INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $805k · revenue +304% · 45% of their budget
  • AC
    A CARING PLACE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $28k · revenue +350%
  • II
    ITNBLUEGRASS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • LE
    LIONS EYE BANK OF LEXINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • HO
    Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • KD
    KY DISASTER RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lions Industries for the Blind Inc

Employment of the blind and visually impaired

Employment
2
Blindness-Learning in New Dimensions Inc

BLIND, Inc. was founded by blind Minnesotans who believe that, given the proper training and opportunity, blind people can lead normal, independent, and fulfilled lives. We believe that blindness is respectable and that with proper…

Health
3
The Lighthouse for the Blind in New Orleans Inc

To empower people with disabilities through employment, services and advocacy.

Health
4
New Vision for Independence Inc

New vision for independence, inc. (new vision) is a nationally accredited 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization providing rehabilitation, community education, and support services for people with low vision or blindness, and their families to…

Human Services
5
Lighthouse for the Blind of the Palm Beaches Inc

Lighthouse for the blind of the palm beaches, inc's mission is to assist persons with visual impairments to develop their capabilities to the fullest and to utilize them in the pursuits of life which are the right and privilege of all.

—
6
Alabama Lions Sight Association Inc

The Association's Mission is to fund quality eye treatment for the medically indigent of Alabama. Services provided include providing glasses, surgeries, anesthesia, medically necessary contact lenses, prosthesis, tests and eye medication.

Health
7
Radio Eye Inc

The organization's mission is to broadcast the reading of current newspapers and other everyday literature, offering greater independent living to people who are blind, visually impaired or physically handicapped.

Arts & Culture
8
Blind-Visually Impaired Early Services of Tennesse

Blind early services tn ensures that families are empowered and equipped through specialized programs of support to provide young children who are blind or low vision their absolute best start.

Youth Development
9
Florida Center for the Blind Inc

The mission of the florida center for the blind is to foster hope, confidence and independence in individuals with visual impairments; and to educate the community about preventing vision loss.

—
10
Arizona Lions Vision and Hearing Foundation of Md 21

Provide vision and hearing screening and corrective vision and hearing surgeries to individuals within arizona who economically are unable to afford such services.

Health
11
The Arkansas Lighthouse for the Blind Inc

To improve occupational opportunity and public perception of legally blind arkansans through community engagement, work skills enhancement and the production of quality goods and services.

—
12
Louisiana Association for the Blind Inc

Louisiana association for the blind's core mission is to provide stable employment, vocational training, and rehabilitative services, along with employment to individuals who are blind and visually impaired in louisiana.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leader Dogs for the Blind; the most unlike its peers is A Caring Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEXINGTON LIONS CLUB ENDOWMENT INC: $805,113 · Community ImprovementLEXINGTON LIONS CLUB ENDOWMENT INCLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $35,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FO…A CARING PLACE INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesA CARING PLACE…ITNBLUEGRASS INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesITNBLUEGRASS I…Step by Step Inc: $20,500 · Human ServicesStep by Step I…ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $17,500 · Human ServicesENVISION BLIND…Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the…UNSHACKLED BY LOVE MINISTRIES: $58,175 · OtherUNSHACKLE…LIONS EYE BANK OF LEXINGTON: $20,000 · OtherLIONS EYE…KY DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $10,000 · OtherKY DISAST…KENTUCKY LIONS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · Health
Community Improvement$805,113Human Services$133,000Other$88,175Health$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEXINGTON LIONS CLUB ENDOWMENT INC: $805,113 over 8y, 45% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA CARING PLACE INC: $28,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetKENTUCKY LIONS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetITNBLUEGRASS INC: $22,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetStep by Step Inc: $20,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $17,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetHospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lions Club International Lexington Lions Club Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lions Club International Lexington Lions Club Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lions Club International Lexington Lions Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph