Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lindley Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$408kFood & Nutrition$271kEducation$117kHuman Services$86kHousing & Shelter$64kInternational$30kHealth$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$4,300
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURDUE FARM HOUSE FOUNDATION$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$13,000
PURDUE FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTHERN IL FOOD BANK$5,000
GARFIELD FARM$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,300
CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$500
MERCY HOME$485
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$100
ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL$50
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$10
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%CRADLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
SD
IN
PA
RI
CA
NE
VA
KS
AR
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$997k · 37 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
13

Total granted

$997k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+18%

Still filing today

35%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    Purdue Farmhouse Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +36% · 39% of their budget
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +145%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Cradle Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • EM
    EISENHOWER MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
School Nutrition Association Inc

To empower and support school nutrition professionals in advancing the accessibility, quality and integrity of school nutrition programs.

—
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $402,200 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPurdue Farmhouse Foundation: $187,900 · OtherPurdue Farmhouse FoundationPURDUE FOUNDATION: $115,650 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $59,900 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $55,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY+31 more: $113,600 · Other+31 moreNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $31,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS: $12,214 · Food & NutritionCRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,800 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $700 · Health+2 more: $125 · HealthThe Cradle Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $2,071 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,600 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,350 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,900 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,650 · InternationalUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $150 · Public BenefitSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $100 · Recreation & SportsPAWS INC: $75 · Animals
Other$934,250Food & Nutrition$45,214Health$19,125Human Services$16,021International$6,550Public Benefit$150Recreation & Sports$100Animals$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPurdue Farmhouse Foundation: $187,900 over 9y, 39% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $12,214 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetThe Cradle Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $2,071 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Purdue Farmhouse Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds The Cradle Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lindley Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lindley Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lindley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph