· Private foundation
Lincoln Dynamic Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CLIMATE MOBILIZATION PROJECT | $56,250 |
| GREEN OUR PLANET | $25,000 |
| DISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| STARTEMPOWERMENT | $17,225 |
| CORE POWERED BY THE ROGERS FOUNDATION | $15,275 |
| THE OBODO COLLECTIVE INC | $15,000 |
| COOL EFFECT | $5,183 |
| FOSTER KINSHIP | $5,000 |
| COLLABORATION CENTER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NEVADA NEWS BUREA INC | $5,000 |
| ONE DROP FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +95%
- NPNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH4× · 2020–2023 · $75k · revenue +59%
- GAGrant A Gift Autism Foundation4× · 2019–2022 · $70k · revenue +401%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $25k
- ASAFTER SCHOOL ALL STARS GREATER LAS VEGAS INNER-CITY GAMESone grant, 2020 · $15k
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADAone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nevada kids foundation is a children's non profit that provides essential items and resources to the struggling youth in our communities. our goal is to empower children to live a life with greater hope, freedom, and opportunities for…
Nevada child seekers mission is to advocate for and engage in prevention, identification and location efforts on behalf of missing and exploited children.
Jobs for nevadas graduates has a mission to empower young people with the skills and support to succeed in education, employment, and life.
Our membership is united in pursuit of immediate and continuous improvements to the state's education system. we support an ambitious, agressive and comprehensive reform agenda to dramatically increase the college and workforce readiness…
Founded in 2008, ImpactNV has served as an independent nonprofit comprised of Nevadas public and private entities and NGOs. The goal of this alliance is to make Nevada and its communities more environmentally, economically and socially…
Our mission is to prevent child trafficking by empowering young people to protect themselves and by educating and engaging the community to recognize the signs and to take safe and responsible action.
Educate Nevada Now (ENN) is a non-partisan education policy organization focused on ensuring that every Nevada child has access to a quality education, regardless of their family income or circumstances. ENN strives to make fair and…
Kids Chance of Nevada provides college and technical scholarships to the children of parents who have been killed or severely injured in a workplace accident in Nevada.
To support, encourage and educate families of deaf and hard of hearing children to empower them to make choices that will enable their children to achieve their full potential.
Communities in schools of nevada, inc. (the organization) was originally established in 1992 as cities of schools of las vegas, but remained relatively dormant until 2003 when it reestablished its mission to coincide with the national…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaders in Training and the most unlike its peers is Critical Care Comics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 32% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLABORATION CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Climate Mobilization Project Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Grant A Gift Autism Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE JUST ONE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Cool Effect Inc ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GREEN OUR PLANET ↗
- Who funds CORE POWERED BY THE ROGERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOSTER KINSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS ↗
- Who funds Start Empowerment Inc ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE TO TURKIYE ↗
- Who funds BABY'S BOUNTY ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds FUTURE SMILES ↗
- Who funds The Ability Center of Southern Nevada Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
- Who funds Pride Tree ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds NEVADA NEWS BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mondays Dark · Speedway Children's Charities · Canarelli Family Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Engelstad Family Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Raiders Foundation Nv · Three Square
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lincoln Dynamic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.