Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lin & Susie Chen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$624kInternational$360kFood & Nutrition$192kCommunity Improvement$161kHuman Services$160kEmployment$155kReligion$151kRecreation & Sports$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $240k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$60,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$45,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$40,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM$40,000
GARDEN OF HOPE$35,000
CHINESE AMERCAN PLANNING COUNCIL$20,000
UNIVERSAL HUMAN BODY ENERGY OF AMERICA$20,000
CHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC$20,000
CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CARTER BURDEN NETWORK$2,500
GUANDONG ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$2,500
LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $329k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GARDEN OF HOPE: $35k → 20%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $40k → 14%GARDEN OF HOPE: $25k → 20%GARDEN OF HOPE: $15k → 20%GARDEN OF HOPE: $15k → 20%GARDEN OF HOPE: $15k → 20%GARDEN OF HOPE: $10k → 20%GARDEN OF HOPE: $5k → 20%GARDEN OF HOPE: $3k → 20%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $3k → 17%GARDEN OF HOPE: $3k → 20%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $3k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $20k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $16k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 29 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
4

Total granted

$2.2M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+179%

Still filing today

52%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +70%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $185k · revenue +67%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • QF
    QCC FUND PORT OF ENTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GA
    GUNANDONG ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chinese American Medical Society

The Chinese American Medical Society (the Society) was created in the State of NY in 1964. Its mission is to improve the health status of Chinese Americans and to promote excellence in health care for all through the mobilization of health…

Health
2
New York Downtown Hospital Chinese Community Partnership for Health Foundat Ion Inc

To broaden health care access, provide educational opportunities and services with a professional health team in a culturally sensitive fashion to the chinese population in the community. its objective is to meet the unmet healthcare needs…

Health
3
Chinatown Health Clinic Foundation Inc

Chinatown health clinic foundation, inc.'s purpose is to improve the health conditions of the asian american community in the greater ny metropolitan area manner that is culturally relevant and respectful of the individual's dignity, and…

Philanthropy
4
New York Chinese Cultural Center Inc

It is dedicated to deepening the understanding and appreciation of chinese culture in the global and local communities. it fulfills its mission by offering professional classes, workshops, and performances while nurturing creative new…

Arts & Culture
5
N Y C Mission Society

NYC Mission Society improves the lives of children, youth and families in the City's most underserved communities. Through programs and services that respond to community needs, we create cycles of success for generations to come.

Human Services
6
Apicha Community Health Center

At apicha community health center, our mission is to provide high quality, equitable, whole person, and culturally responsive care delivered in an inclusive and welcoming manner.

Health
7
Welcome to Chinatown Inc

Welcome to Chinatown strengthens Chinatowns small business ecosystem through coaching, capital matchmaking, cultural integration, and thought leadership. We provide entrepreneurs with the tools, data, and community infrastructure needed to…

Community Improvement
8
Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc

CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…

Civil Rights
9
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
10
Humanitarian China

Provide humanitarian support in China. Help to develop a civil society in China. Promote rule-of-law,human rights, and freedom of expressions.Focus on grass-root and people who are neglected by the outside world

International
11
Community Healthcare Network

Chn provides a broad range of health services including but not limited to primary and preventative care, and mental health services to a largely medically underserved population.

Health
12
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC: $200,000 · OtherCHINATOWN HEALTH CLINICUN WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $150,000 · OtherUN WORLD FOOD PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSAL BODY ENERGY OF AMERICA: $115,000 · OtherUNIVERSAL BODY ENERGY OF AMERICAHOCHI INSTITUTE: $41,000 · OtherUNIVERSAL HUMAN BODY ENERGY OF AMERICA: $40,000 · Other+16 more: $157,040 · Other+16 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $185,000 · InternationalInternational Res…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $175,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $156,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICA…GARDEN OF HOPE INC: $125,500 · Human ServicesGARDEN OF HOPE …FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE …+1 more: $7,000 · Human ServicesCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $200,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPOR…The Fistula Foundation: $54,000 · HealthThe Fistula F…Children's Hospital Corporation: $15,000 · HealthChildren's Ho…CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC: $155,000 · EmploymentBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $42,500 · ReligionChristian Herald Association Inc: $30,000 · ReligionCHINESE FREE MASON ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCOOL CULTURE INC: $4,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,093,040International$360,000Human Services$328,500Health$269,000Employment$155,000Religion$72,500Arts & Culture$54,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $200,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $185,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $156,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC: $155,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGARDEN OF HOPE INC: $125,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $54,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHINESE FREE MASON ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $50,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOCHI INSTITUTE: $41,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL CULTURE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE FREE MASON ATHLETIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOCHI INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COOL CULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS FOR UNITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lin & Susie Chen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lin & Susie Chen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lin & Susie Chen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lin & Susie Chen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lin & Susie Chen’s filings →

More from the funding graph