Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lillys Gift Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$520k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$2.6MArts & Culture$2.5MHealth$1.5MAnimals$731kHousing & Shelter$497kInternational$365kHuman Services$330kEducation$292kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCKENZIE RIVER TRUST$55,000
MARCOLA ELEMENTARY PTO$50,000
LIBERATION PATHWAYS HEALING PLACE$40,000
MARCOLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$20,000
NEWPORT MESA CHURCH$20,000
OREGON HORSE RESCUE$20,000
SEEDING JUSTICE THE CHUUSH FUND$20,000
BOARD HOUSE SOCIETY$15,000
COMPANION ANIMAL MEDICAL PROJECT (CAMP CLINIC)$15,000
SOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATION WATER IS LIFE PROGRAMS$15,000
OREGON WORKER RELIEF FUND$15,000
PROGRAMA DE AYUDA INC (DBA LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION)$10,000
LANE COUNTY SHEREES MOUNTED POSSE$10,000
ROARING RIVER WATER COLLECTIVE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $386k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS REPUBLIC: $15k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 9%MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $15k → 7%BOYS REPUBLIC: $10k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $12k → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $10k → 7%BOYS REPUBLIC: $5k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%BOYS REPUBLIC: $5k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%HOPE & SAFETY ALLIANCE: $15k → 15%BOYS REPUBLIC: $5k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%BOYS REPUBLIC: $5k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 9%BOARD HOUSE SOCIETY: $15k → 10%MADRONE HOSPICE: $25k → 16%THE MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $12k → 10%MADRONE HOSPICE INC: $25k → 16%THE MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $8k → 10%MADRONE HOSPICE: $25k → 16%THE MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $7k → 10%MADRONE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%MADRONE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%MADRONE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%MADRONE HOSPICE: $15k → 16%HITCHING POST MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
CA
CO
AZ
TN
NC
SC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Lillys Gift Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 61%.

Lillys Gift Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 78 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
44

Total granted

$8.9M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+26%

Still filing today

47%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1D
    10th District Junior Livestock Committee Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +49% · 26% of their budget
  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300k · revenue +19%
  • SH
    STABLE HANDS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $184k · revenue +35% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • FF
    FAMILIES FORWARDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +49%
  • OR
    ORE-CAL RCD
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • RC
    REDEMPTION CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
2
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
3
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
4
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
5
Oregon Dog Rescue

Conduct rescue of dogs, facilitate adoptions of same. provide emergency vet services for dogs needing rescue

Animals
6
Believe Ranch and Rescue
Animals
7
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
8
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
9
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
10
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
11
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
12
Fighting Chance Ranch & Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward; the most unlike its peers is Board House Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/59
Grantees still filing
40/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULELAKE-BUTTE VALLEY FAIR FRIENDS: $2,475,000 · OtherTULELAKE-BUTTE VALLEY FAIR FRIENDS10TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIAT: $1,450,000 · Other10TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATFAMILIES FORWARD: $300,000 · Other+101 more: $3,243,500 · Other+101 more10th District Junior Livestock Committee Inc: $1,025,000 · Education10th Distri…+4 more: $81,000 · Education+4 moreMARCH OF DIMES INC: $195,000 · HealthSTABLE HANDS: $184,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $79,000 · HealthASANTE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthCATALIGHT FOUNDATION: $58,000 · HealthBUTTE VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICES INC: $49,500 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · Health+1 more: $20,000 · HealthPURR-ANGELS: $95,000 · AnimalsNORTHWEST DOG PROJECT: $50,000 · AnimalsPAWTCAKE REFUGE INC: $50,000 · AnimalsPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $50,000 · AnimalsKLAMATH HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $44,000 · AnimalsRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $43,500 · AnimalsCalifornia Deer Association: $40,000 · AnimalsCAMP COCKER RESCUE INC: $30,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $30,000 · AnimalsSISKIYOU SPAY NEUTER INCENTIVE PROGRAM: $20,500 · Animals+4 more: $42,500 · AnimalsMADRONE HOSPICE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $87,500 · Human ServicesMUSTARD SEED RANCH INC: $63,500 · Human ServicesBoys Republic: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOMENSPACE: $15,000 · Human ServicesBoard House Society: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $300,000 · InternationalOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $30,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$7,468,500Education$1,106,000Health$720,500Animals$495,500Human Services$386,000International$300,000Housing & Shelter$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULELAKE-BUTTE VALLEY FAIR FRIENDS: $2,475,000 over 8y, 68% of budget10th District Junior Livestock Committee Inc: $1,025,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD: $300,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $195,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTABLE HANDS: $184,000 over 7y, 30% of budgetMADRONE HOSPICE INC: $150,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetKLAMATH LAKE COUNTIES FOOD BANK: $120,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $105,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPURR-ANGELS: $95,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $87,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $79,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMUSTARD SEED RANCH INC: $63,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetOREGON HORSE RESCUE: $60,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetCATALIGHT FOUNDATION: $58,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST DOG PROJECT: $50,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetPAWTCAKE REFUGE INC: $50,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBUTTE VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICES INC: $49,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetKLAMATH HOSPICE INC: $46,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBoys Republic: $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKLAMATH FALLS GOSPEL MISSION: $44,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetKLAMATH HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $44,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $43,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCalifornia Deer Association: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKLAMATH ADVOCACY CENTER: $35,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCROSSPOINT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP COCKER RESCUE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENEFIT FOR THE BASIN: $25,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetSISKIYOU SPAY NEUTER INCENTIVE PROGRAM: $20,500 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetCASCADIA WILDLANDS: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSEEDING JUSTICE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED ORANGE COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWOMENSPACE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBoard House Society: $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetRESCUE RANCH: $12,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetThink Wild: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMART READING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TULELAKE-BUTTE VALLEY FAIR FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds 10th District Junior Livestock Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds STABLE HANDS ↗
  • Who funds MADRONE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds KLAMATH LAKE COUNTIES FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds PURR-ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds CATALIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds McKenzie River Trust ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST DOG PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR19.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Klamath Medical Service Bureau Foundatio Attn Timothy a Bailey · Graham Family Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lillys Gift Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lillys Gift Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 59%
  • Womenspace: 62% of income from government
  • Klamath Advocacy Center: 60% of income from government
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 3% of income from government
  • Seeding Justice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lillys Gift’s filings →

More from the funding graph