Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lila & Violet Zaranti Fndtn Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$105kReligion$91kHousing & Shelter$65kYouth Development$61kHuman Services$52kHealth$28kCivil Rights$20k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGEPORT CATHOLIC ACADEMY$15,000
BROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
RESURRECTION PROJECT$10,000
TFK CHICAGO VOYAGERS$7,500
FRANCISCAN OUTREACH$5,500
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR CHICAGO INC$4,645
PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $6k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $6k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $7k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $5k → 14%PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $5k → 14%PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $5k → 14%PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $3k → 14%PRO LIFE CHAMPIONS: $3k → 14%PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $3k → 14%PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302k · 13 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$302k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-4%

Still filing today

54%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TFK Chicago Voyagers
    7× · 2019–2025 · $51k · revenue +55%
  • TR
    The Resurrection Project
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +60%
  • AF
    AID FOR WOMEN INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • US
    UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC
    one grant, 2020 · $29k
  • TC
    The Courage Program
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • SB
    ST BENEDICT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Right to Life Committee

To provide information on alternatives to abortion

Civil Rights
2
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
3
Pregnancy Aid South Suburbs

The organization assists and empowers the greater southland chicago communities by providing a life-affirming network of care through prevention, crisis intervention, education, and restoration.

Health
4
Loving Arms - a Crisis Pregnancy Center

Sharing the love of christ while promoting sexual integrity and bringing life affirming services to those unprepared for pregnancy or hurt by abortion

Health
5
Chicago Foundlings Home

The Home currently provides support to charitable organizations that provide care, education and other services in community-based settings to expectant mothers, mothers, infants and children. Additionally, the Home provides required…

Human Services
6
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
7
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
8
Spoon River Pregnancy Resource Ctr

Spoon River Pregnancy Center provides no-cost pregnancy testing, limited ultrasounds, parenting and fatherhood education, and material assistance to support individuals and families facing pregnancy and early-parenting needs.

Education
9
Illinois Community for Displaced Immigrants

Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.

Human Services
10
Hope Life Center

A christ centered organization dedicated to erasing abortion from illinois one woman and one child at a time.

Health
11
Paris Pregnancy Care Center Inc

To provide assistance to women with crisis pregnancies. the centers are committed to provide their clients with accurate and complete information about both prenatal development and abortion.

Health
12
Repro Tlc

Repro TLC improves access to comprehensive reproductive health care by training providers in abortion and miscarriage care, contraception, pregnancy options counseling, and beyond. Rooted in the Midwest, Repro TLC fills gaps nationwide in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Resurrection Project; the most unlike its peers is Pro-Life Champions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF TEPEYAC ELEMENTARY: $29,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC ELEMENTARYUNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC: $28,500 · OtherUNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLICAID FOR WOMEN INC: $25,000 · OtherAID FOR WOMEN INCBRIDGEPORT CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $25,000 · OtherBRIDGEPORT CATHOLIC ACADEMYST AGNES PARISH: $24,000 · OtherST AGNES PARISHFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $22,500 · OtherFRANCISCAN OUTREACHBROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherBROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOLLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR CHICAGO ST MARY'S HOME: $11,645 · OtherOur Lady of Guadalupe School: $10,490 · OtherThe Courage Program: $10,000 · OtherST BENEDICT SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherFR MICHAEL J MCGIVNEY CENTERS OF HOPE: $10,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CHURCH: $9,500 · Other+7 more: $40,000 · Other+7 moreTFK Chicago Voyagers: $51,000 · Youth DevelopmentTFK Chicago V…PARENTING FOR NON VIOLENCE: $23,500 · Human ServicesPARENTING F…PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $20,000 · Human ServicesPRO-LIFE CH…The Resurrection Project: $42,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurre…SOUTHSIDE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$281,135Youth Development$51,000Human Services$43,500Housing & Shelter$42,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTFK Chicago Voyagers: $51,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPARENTING FOR NON VIOLENCE: $23,500 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS: $20,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR CHICAGO ST MARY'S HOME: $11,645 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHSIDE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TFK Chicago Voyagers ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTING FOR NON VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds PRO-LIFE CHAMPIONS ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR CHICAGO ST MARY'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

WP & HB White FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: WP & HB White Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lila & Violet Zaranti Fndtn Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lila & Violet Zaranti Fndtn Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lila & Violet Zaranti Fndtn Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph