Skip to content
Lifestyle Homes Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lifestyle Homes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$122k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MPhilanthropy$316kHousing & Shelter$182kHealth$134kPublic Benefit$108kCommunity Improvement$51kCrime & Legal$44kAnimals$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $122k
$11,538
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHOE COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS$121,789
NEVADA YOUTH EMPOWERMENT$40,000
WASHOE COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOLS$33,838
KARMA BOX PROJECT$12,938
Individual grant recipient$11,538
NORTHERN NEVADA HOPES$4,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$2,500
OPTIONS VETERINARY CARE$2,102
RENO-SPARKS POP WARNER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$991
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RIDGE HOUSE INC: $500 → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $808 → 10%KARMA BOX PROJECT: $31k → 10%KARMA BOX PROJECT: $13k → 10%KARMA BOX PROJECT: $6k → 10%KARMA BOX PROJECT: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 23 repeat orgs$409k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
24

Total granted

$1.5M
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+69%

Still filing today

26%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KB
    Karma Box Project
    4× · 2022–2025 · $52k · revenue +34%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +65%
  • NN
    Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services
    7× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • PF
    Parsemus Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $300k · revenue -2% · 58% of their budget
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -39%
  • SL
    SIMARRON LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
3
Nevada Healthright

Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.

Health
4
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
5
Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

—
6
Northern Nevada Harm Reduction Alliance

Charitable

Health
7
Nevada County Habitat for Humanity

Building decent affordable homes in partnership with local families who qualify.

Housing & Shelter
8
Nevada Wild Horses

Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.

Animals
9
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
10
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
11
Veterans Guest House Inc

Veterans Guest House promotes peace and wellness for the veteran community.

Unclassified
12
Nevada Boxer Rescue

Rescue, rehab, and place abandoned dogs

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eddy House; the most unlike its peers is Parsemus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHOE COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $600,641 · OtherWASHOE COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSWASHOE CO ELEM SCHOOLS: $285,607 · OtherWASHOE CO ELEM SCHOOLSWashoe County: $78,310 · OtherNEVADA YOUTH EMPOWERMENT: $77,746 · OtherWASHOE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $57,201 · OtherWASHOE COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOLS: $51,758 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $51,288 · Other+29 more: $265,903 · Other+29 moreParsemus Foundation: $300,000 · PhilanthropyParsemus Foundatio…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyKarma Box Project: $51,565 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesTU CASA LATINA: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,308 · Human ServicesREBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services: $20,266 · HealthKatie Weingartner Foundation: $5,550 · EducationReno-Sparks Pop Warner: $3,750 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,468,454Philanthropy$310,000Human Services$59,873Housing & Shelter$50,000Health$45,266Education$5,550Recreation & Sports$3,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetParsemus Foundation: $300,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetKarma Box Project: $51,565 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA: $50,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services: $20,266 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKatie Weingartner Foundation: $5,550 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF NORTHERN NV: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReno-Sparks Pop Warner: $3,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTU CASA LATINA: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEVADA VETERANS MEMORIAL PLAZA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAnimal Ark Incorporated: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $808 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENO TOY RUN: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRIDGE HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Parsemus Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Karma Box Project ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
  • Who funds Katie Weingartner Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF NORTHERN NV ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Reno-Sparks Pop Warner ↗
  • Who funds TU CASA LATINA ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA VETERANS MEMORIAL PLAZA ↗
  • Who funds Animal Ark Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Renown HealthThe E L Cord Foundati…John Ben Snow Memoria…NV Energy Charitable …Susanne & Gloria Youn…Helen Close Charitabl…Thelma B & Thomas P H…Peek Family Charitabl…The Nell J Redfield F…Hilltop FoundationRobert Z Hawkins Foun…
Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Renown Health · The E L Cord Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Susanne & Gloria Young Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Hilltop Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lifestyle Homes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lifestyle Homes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lifestyle Homes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home