Skip to content

· Private foundation

Liebchen's Gift Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$8.1MEnvironment$25kHealth$23kReligion$11kEducation$7kCrime & Legal$4kHuman Services$3kInternational$2k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.3M
$70,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CEN$3,277,500
Individual grant recipient$780,000
LIONS TIGERS & BEARS THE SAN DIEGO$268,551
TURPENTINE CREEK WILDLIFE REFUGE$187,500
YELLOW RIVER ANIMAL SANCTUARY$170,000
ERIE COUNTY SPCA$101,784
WHITE WHISKERS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY$95,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$90,000
FIDO FRIENDS OF INDIANAPOLIS DOGS$90,000
INDY NEIGHBORHOOD CATS$75,000
PHOENIX HERPETOLOGICAL SANCTUARY$70,000
THREE RING RANCH EXOTIC ANIMALS$70,000
TEN LIVES CLUB$63,400
OLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY$60,000
HASTY'S HAVEN INC$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
IN
OH
CA
UT
AZ
AR
TN
SC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 19 repeat orgs$983k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
17

Total granted

$7.2M
$340k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+90%

Still filing today

58%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $643k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +69% · 51% of their budget
  • EC
    ERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $304k · revenue +97%
  • TL
    TEN LIVES CLUB INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $190k
  • SA
    SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER - IND
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • FF
    FIDO FRIENDS INDIANAPOLIS DOGS OUTS
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
2
Raskels Rescue
Animals
3
Society for Animal Rescue and Adoption

Operate true "no-kill" animal sanctuary which provides rehabilitation to abused or abandoned domestic and factory farm animals on its 120 acre preserve.

Animals
4
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
5
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
6
Paws Claws Exotics

A sanctuary for unfortunate animals

—
7
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
8
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
9
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
10
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
11
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
12
Second Chance Animal Refuge Society

No kill animal refuge for abused and homeless animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Erie County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Big Bear Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $3,442,260 · AnimalsSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTERERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $303,824 · AnimalsERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSTEN LIVES CLUB INC: $299,550 · AnimalsTEN LIVES CLUB INCBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $280,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC: $225,000 · Animals+10 more: $609,600 · Animals+10 moreIndividual grant recipient: $1,035,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIDO FRIENDS OF INDIANAPOLIS DOGS: $320,000 · OtherFIDO FRIENDS OF INDIANAPOLIS DOGSLIONS TIGERS & BEARS THE SAN DIEGO: $268,551 · OtherLIONS TIGERS & BEARS THE SAN DIEGOTHREE RING RANCH EXOTIC ANIMALS: $260,000 · OtherTHREE RING RANCH EXOTIC ANIMALSIndividual grant recipient: $189,905 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYELLOW RIVER ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $170,000 · OtherYELLOW RIVER ANIMAL SANCTUARYIndividual grant recipient: $140,000 · Other+18 more: $288,105 · Other+18 moreTURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC: $297,500 · EnvironmentNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Animals$5,160,234Other$2,671,611Environment$297,500Education$7,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $3,442,260 over 3y, 51% of budgetERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $303,824 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTEN LIVES CLUB INC: $299,550 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetTURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC: $297,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $280,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC: $225,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetPHOENIX HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $165,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetINDY NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC: $100,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetWHITE WHISKERS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $95,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHASTYS HAVEN INC: $90,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBESTSELF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $16,705 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetExotic Feline Rescue Center: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds TEN LIVES CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDY NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE WHISKERS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds HASTYS HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Montana Wild Wings Recovery Center ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG BEAR VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BESTSELF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Exotic Feline Rescue Center ↗
  • Who funds GEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petsmart Charities IncAZ16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petsmart Charities Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Liebchen's Gift Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Liebchen's Gift Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Liebchen's Gift Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Liebchen's Gift Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Liebchen's Gift’s filings →

    More from the funding graph