Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lichtenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2019
19
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$657kArts & Culture$177kReligion$13kEducation$8kFood & Nutrition$3kHealth$2k
02FY2019 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k17 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Smithsonian Archives of American Art$13,500
Phillips Collection$10,000
Washington Hebrew Congregation$4,370
Individual grant recipient$2,500
The Nora School$2,500
Martha's Table$1,000
Sidwell Friends School$1,000
Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington$1,000
The Studio Theatre$500
Mount Sinai Hospital$250
Early Alzheimer's Foundation$250
Metropolitan Museum of Art$210
Museum of Modern Art$140
Whitney Museum of American Art$125
Museum of Arts & Design$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Charity Navigator: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 18 repeat orgs$693k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$166k
$693k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+124%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +60%
  • TN
    THE NORA SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +77%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CF
    Community Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $657k
  • KC
    Kennedy Center Centennial Circle
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • MS
    Mount Sinai - Hertzberg Palliative Care
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
6
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
9
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
10
The National Museum of Women in the Arts

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. we strive to accomplish…

—
11
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
12
Peabody Essex Museum Inc

Pem offers thought-provoking experiences of the arts, humanities, and sciences to activate understanding of our shared humanity and to empower imagination and learning through experimentation. we steward, build, and make our collections…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Modern Art; the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Foundation: $656,757 · OtherCommunity FoundationSmithsonian Archives of American Art: $103,750 · OtherSmithsonian Archives of American ArtKennedy Center Centennial Circle: $35,000 · Other+8 more: $29,395 · OtherTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $22,750 · Arts & CultureLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $3,000 · Arts & CultureThe Studio Theatre Inc: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $2,150 · Arts & CultureMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionEARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC: $750 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $250 · HealthARTTABLE INC: $300 · Public BenefitCharity Navigator: $250 · Human Services
Other$824,902Arts & Culture$29,400Food & Nutrition$3,000Health$1,000Public Benefit$300Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $22,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORA SCHOOL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Studio Theatre Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $630 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $420 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTTABLE INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
  • Who funds THE NORA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Studio Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds EARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ARTTABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lichtenberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lichtenberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lichtenberg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph