Skip to content

· Private foundation

Li Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$119kArts & Culture$21kHealth$8kHuman Services$3kHousing & Shelter$500Employment$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN$1,200
MCKENNA CLAIRE FOUNDATION$500
CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY$500
HOOVER INSTITUTION$300
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLAND SCHOOL: $5k → 7%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $300 → 8%BUILD FUTURES: $200 → 10%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $21k → 14%CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $3k → 13%MENLO ATHERTON FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $200 → 8%BUILD FUTURES: $100 → 10%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $7k → 14%CHILDRENS ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $3k → 13%MENLO ATHERTON MUSIC BOOSTERS: $500 → 7%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $200 → 8%BUILD FUTURES: $100 → 10%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $4k → 14%CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $500 → 13%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $200 → 8%BUILD FUTURES: $100 → 10%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $3k → 14%CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $500 → 13%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $100 → 8%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $1k → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $100 → 8%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $803 → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $100 → 8%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $500 → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $100 → 8%HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $500 → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $100 → 8%SUN YAT SEN CHINESE INST: $500 → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $20k → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $13k → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $11k → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $10k → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $10k → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $5k → 14%CSC CHINATOWN: $5k → 14%CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 14%PERFECT HARMONY CULTURAL EXCHG: $1k → 14%TAISHAN HIGH ALUMNI: $2k → 14%PERFECT HARMONY CULTURAL EXCHG: $1k → 14%HELP SAFETY: $500 → 14%PERFECT HARMONY CULTURAL EXCHG: $1k → 14%AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 8 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$131k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-70%
+138%

Still filing today

38%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2019–2025 · $74k
  • HA
    HUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $37k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • CS
    CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +138%
  • CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +496%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Altos Chinese School Childrens Center

Los Altos Chinese School Childrens Center offers a year-round, full-day, bilingual program for preschool students (3 to 5 years old) in the Los Altos area.

Education
2
Crossroads School for Arts and Sciences

Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.

Education
3
Silicon Valley Chinese School

The missions of The School are to provide high-quality Chinese education to help students master the Chinese language and culture, promote the inheritance and development of Chinese culture, enhance mutual understanding and friendship…

Arts & Culture
4
Central Chinese High School in America

Operate school to teach Chinese language to students from kindergarten to 12th grade.

Arts & Culture
5
California University - Silicon Valley

Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.

Education
6
Venus Chinese School
Public Benefit
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
California Youth Symphony Association

The mission of the California Youth Symphony (CYS) is to serve the community while providing talented young musicians with the finest musical experience and the opportunity for personal growth through the training and performance of…

Arts & Culture
9
Citrus Springs Charter School Inc

Our mission is to foster the innate curiosity of our students, empower their parents, and promote optimum learning by collaboratively developing a personalized learning program for each student.

Education
10
Oaks Christian School

The school's mission is: to dedicate ourselves to christ in the pursuit of academic excellence, artistic expression, and athletic distinction while growing in knowledge and wisdom through god's abundant grace.

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Silicon Valley International School

Silicon valley international school's focus on inquiry and bilingualism empowers young minds to embrace complexity, think critically from multiple perspectives, and demonstrate integrity and sensitivity across cultures.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinatown Service Center; the most unlike its peers is Build Futures. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $74,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN: $37,203 · OtherHUBEI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERNTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · Other+10 more: $15,500 · Other+10 moreLAS LOMITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4,500 · EducationCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $4,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,400 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $175 · Health
Other$140,203Education$10,400Health$175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $7,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLAS LOMITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBuild Futures: $500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAS LOMITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Build Futures ↗
  • Who funds SUN YAT SEN CHINESE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Li Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Li Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Li Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph