Skip to content

· Public charity

Lewmar Foundation

Public charity - provide scholarships and grants to educational institutions and program sponsors

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$68kEducation$58kYouth Development$500
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI'S CATTLEMEN FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $1k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $10k → 8%MIDWEST INSTITUTE: $2k → 9%MISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%MONROE CITY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 12%LEWIS CTY LAW ENFRCMNT YTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $1k → 14%COLUMBIA COLLEGE: $2k → 17%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 28%MACMURRAY COLLEGE: $1k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 13%TWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%PALMYRA HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%LAGRANGE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 14%MISSOURI'S CATTLEMEN FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 28%JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 13%TWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE: $5k → 14%MISSOURI'S CATTLEMEN FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 13%HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 14%MISSOURI'S CATTLEMEN FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%CULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE: $5k → 14%MISSOURI'S CATTLEMEN FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 14%MISSOURI'S CATTLEMEN FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%CANTON R-V SCHOOL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92k · 8 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$92k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISSOURIS CATTLEMEN FOUNDATIONINC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $34k · revenue +268%
  • AF
    AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +82%
  • CC
    CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • MC
    MONROE CITY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • PH
    PALMYRA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • QN
    QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
2
Missouri Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture

To assist in providing agricultural related education to all persons and developing agricultural leaders for the future.

Youth Development
3
Muhlenberg College

Muhlenberg aims to help students become independent thinkers who are intellectually agile, characterized by a zest for reasoned and civil debate, knowledgeable about the achievements and traditions of diverse civilizations and cultures,…

Education
4
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
5
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
6
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
7
Defiance College

Defiance College graduates students to lead distinctive lives in their chosen professions through a spirit of service by preparing them to Know, To Understand, To Lead, and To Serve.

Education
8
Drury University

Drury University is an independent university, church-related, grounded in the liberal arts tradition and committed to personalized education in a community of scholars who value the arts of teaching and learning. (Continued on Schedule O)

Education
9
Mound Farm Holdings Inc

Catholic university providing student focused baccalaureate and graduate education in the spirit of the sisters of mercy. welcomes women and men of all beliefs to join the community in pursuit of education and service to those in need.…

Education
10
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
11
Curry College

Curry college is an inclusive community of diverse learners and educators, committed to continuing our legacy of developing effective communicators with reflective and critical thinking skills.

Education
12
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbia College; the most unlike its peers is Lagrange Community Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONROE CITY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8,270 · OtherMONROE CITY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICTHIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL: $7,665 · OtherHIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOLPALMYRA HIGH SCHOOL: $5,400 · OtherPALMYRA HIGH SCHOOLJOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4,500 · OtherJOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGEMISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · OtherGREAT RIVER TIGER CHAPTERMU ALUMN: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $1,500 · OtherMIDWEST INSTITUTE: $1,500 · Other+8 more: $8,000 · Other+8 moreMISSOURIS CATTLEMEN FOUNDATIONINC: $34,000 · Food & NutritionMISSOURIS CATTLEMEN FOUNDATIONIN…TWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Food & NutritionTWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATIO…AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMER…CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON…QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationQUINCY NOTRE DA…COLUMBIA COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEG…QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $1,000 · EducationQUINCY UNIVERSI…LAGRANGE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$42,835Food & Nutrition$36,000Youth Development$30,000Education$17,500Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURIS CATTLEMEN FOUNDATIONINC: $34,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACMURRAY COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURIS CATTLEMEN FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MACMURRAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LAGRANGE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lindsay Family FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lindsay Family Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewmar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewmar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lewmar Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lewmar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lewmar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph