Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lewis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$19MScience & Tech$5.5MHuman Services$2.4MHousing & Shelter$691kHealth$61kAnimals$60kInternational$25kPhilanthropy$8k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$909k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEARCH MINISTRIES INC$1,100,000
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION$50,000
ELEVATE ETHIOPIA INC$10,000
RETT'S ROOST$10,000
BRAD ECHOLS FAMILY FOUNDATION$10,000
AUKERMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $300k → 4%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $100k → 4%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $50k → 4%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $50k → 4%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $25k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
OH
CO
KY
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 16 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$28M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-12%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +71%
  • GM
    GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $525k · revenue +59%
  • NR
    NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE - CAROLINA POINT
    one grant, 2017 · $750k
  • IC
    IMMANUEL CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • SM
    SHILOH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wings of Refuge Inc

Provide ministry and counseling to troubled marriages and individuals with addictions - ongoing consultations with approximately 400 individuals and families on a biweekly basis.

Human Services
2
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
3
Edge Venture Ministries Inc

Edge venture is a christian mens experience that helps men understand and accept who jesus has called them to be by identifying and facing their brokenness and receiving healing.

Religion
4
Charlotte Rescue Mission

To minister the good news of christianity to individuals caught in the crisis of hopelessness, poverty or chemical addictions by meeting their spiritual, physical, emotional, social, and vocational needs.

Health
5
Everett Gospel Mission

Everett gospel mission engages with the community to alleviate poverty.

Human Services
6
Son Foundation Inc

Serving others' needs by providing christian lodging and support to cancer patients and their caregivers.

Health
7
Teammates in Ministry Inc

Refresh host encourage mentor those in ministry

Religion
8
Amazing Grace Discipleship Ministries

Residential home and outreach program for women coming out of abuse, addiction, or unthinkable circumstances

Religion
9
Faith Home Inc

Faith home provides faith-based alcohol and drug addiction programs in greenwood, spartanburg, and abbeville. we are the largest christian recovery program in the southeast with a 135 resident bed capacity.

—
10
Open Door of Hope Inc

Awake ministries' mission is to holistically equip individuals with the hope and help that they need for abundant living.

Human Services
11
Anchor House Mission

The anchor house serves single moms in need of a loving and supportive community. the anchor house is a transitional housing shelter that provides support and assistance to single mothers to help develop appropriate skills to recover from…

—
12
Reset Ministries Inc

We provide a biblical path for people to deal with their past, develop their character, and deepen their relationship with god.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Aukerman Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRENTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $14,900,000 · OtherBRENTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCHSEARCH MINISTRIES INC: $4,800,000 · OtherSEARCH MINISTRIES INCYOUNG LIFE - FORWARD DIVERSITY INITIATIVE: $2,500,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - FORWARD DIVERSITY INITIATIVEYOUNG LIFE - NATIONAL: $2,200,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - NATIONALDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC: $1,774,650 · OtherDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC+10 more: $1,225,500 · OtherNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $450,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $291,000 · Housing & ShelterGRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC: $525,000 · Human ServicesELEVATE ETHIOPIA INC: $65,000 · InternationalBRAD ECHOLS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyHELPING ONE GUY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyAUKERMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRETT'S ROOST: $30,000 · HealthWAVES OF GRACE: $20,000 · ReligionOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$27,400,150Housing & Shelter$741,000Human Services$525,000International$65,000Philanthropy$55,000Health$30,000Religion$20,000Community Improvement$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC: $1,774,650 over 4y, 21% of budgetGRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC: $525,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $450,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $291,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetELEVATE ETHIOPIA INC: $65,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetRETT'S ROOST: $30,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetBRAD ECHOLS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetWAVES OF GRACE: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetHELPING ONE GUY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetAUKERMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE ETHIOPIA INC ↗
  • Who funds RETT'S ROOST ↗
  • Who funds BRAD ECHOLS FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAVES OF GRACE ↗
  • Who funds THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPING ONE GUY INC ↗
  • Who funds AUKERMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lewis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lewis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lewis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph