Skip to content

Montana · Public charity

Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn

The Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation provides national leadership in maintaining the integrity of the trail and its story through stewardship, scholarship, education, partnership, and cultural inclusiveness.

$84k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
9
Total assets, FY2025
$4.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving15$84k93%
FY20246$51k100%
FY201911$64k100%
FY20181$7kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$109kEnvironment$30kRecreation & Sports$23kEducation$15kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$6kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
OR
SD
IA
IN
NE
MO
VA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
River Relief Inc D/B/A Missouri River Relief$17,20022%
Discovery Expedition of St Charles Mo Inc$15,00015%
Confluences Inc Confluence Project$10,00011%
Lakota Language Consortium Inc$7,50011%
Illini Chapter$7,5001n/a
Friends of Lewis and Clark Bicenten$7,5001n/a
J Gregg Smith Inc$7,5001n/a
Shenandoah University$7,50010%
Yankton County Historical Society$7,50011%
Sioux City Lewis & Clark Interpretive Center$7,50011%
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
River Relief Inc D/B/A Missouri River Relief$17,20022%
Discovery Expedition of St Charles Mo Inc$15,00015%
Confluences Inc Confluence Project$10,00011%
Lakota Language Consortium Inc$7,50011%
Illini Chapter$7,5001n/a
Friends of Lewis and Clark Bicenten$7,5001n/a
J Gregg Smith Inc$7,5001n/a
Shenandoah University$7,50010%
Yankton County Historical Society$7,50011%
Sioux City Lewis & Clark Interpretive Center$7,50011%
Lewis & Clark Exploratory Center of Virginia Inc$7,50018%
Better Ponca Foundation Inc$6,0001n/a
Montana Conservation Corps Inc$6,00010%
Oahe Habitat for Humanity Inc$5,800127%
Falls of the Ohio Foundation$5,0001n/a
Oregon Black Pioneers Corporation$4,00011%
Travelers Rest Preservation & Heritage Assoc$4,00013%
Lewis & Clark Foundation$3,50011%
Nez Perce Historical Society$2,5001n/a
Fort Osage National Historic Landmark Association$2,0541n/a
Opera Theater Oregon$1,5001n/a

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($64k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRiver Relief Inc D/B/A Missouri River Relief: $17,200 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDiscovery Expedition of St Charles Mo Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetConfluences Inc Confluence Project: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLakota Language Consortium Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetShenandoah University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYankton County Historical Society: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSioux City Lewis & Clark Interpretive Center: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLewis & Clark Exploratory Center of Virginia Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetMontana Conservation Corps Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOahe Habitat for Humanity Inc: $5,800 over 1y, 27% of budgetOregon Black Pioneers Corporation: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTravelers Rest Preservation & Heritage Assoc: $4,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLewis & Clark Foundation: $3,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn with peer funders

About Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn

How much does Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn give?
Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn reported 15 grants totaling $83,554 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (52%), Environment (14%), Recreation & Sports (11%).
Who are Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: River Relief Inc D/B/A Missouri River Relief ($17k), Discovery Expedition of St Charles Mo Inc ($15k), Confluences Inc Confluence Project ($10k).
Does Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn based?
Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtn’s filings →

More from the funding graph