Skip to content
Levitt Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Levitt Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$669k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MEnvironment$918kHuman Services$869kYouth Development$825kHousing & Shelter$443kPhilanthropy$346kEducation$260kCommunity Improvement$239kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $586k
$5,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BROTHERHOODSISTER SOL INC$40,000
GROW NYC$35,000
MADISON SQUARE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION INC$35,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC$35,000
CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$35,000
QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN$35,000
EQUITY ADVOCATES$30,000
COMMUNITY FOOD ADVOCATES$30,000
URBAN JUSTICE CENTER$30,000
THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER$30,000
THE URBAN WILD INC$30,000
HARLEM GROWN$30,000
GREEN CITY FORCE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLAREMONT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $40k → 28%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 13%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $40k → 20%BRONXWORKS INC: $45k → 28%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 13%BRONXWORKS INC: $45k → 28%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 13%BRONXWORKS INC: $45k → 28%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 13%BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $35k → 20%BRONXWORKS INC: $45k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $20k → 28%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $30k → 20%BRONXWORKS INC: $20k → 28%KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 28%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $30k → 20%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $30k → 20%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $30k → 20%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $30k → 20%GREEN CITY FORCE: $30k → 20%GREEN CITY FORCE: $5k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $30k → 28%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $30k → 28%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $30k → 28%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%BLOOM AGAIN BKLYN: $2k → 20%BLOOM AGAIN BKLYN: $2k → 20%BLOOM AGAIN BKLYN: $2k → 20%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS: $25k → 20%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS: $25k → 20%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS: $25k → 20%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS: $20k → 20%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS: $20k → 20%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $30k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $30k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $30k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $35k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $30k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 80 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
37

Total granted

$5.8M
$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+19%

Still filing today

76%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $240k · revenue +47%
  • SI
    SCAN-HARBOR INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $235k · revenue +72%
  • TC
    THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +504%

Funded once

  • CN
    CLAREMONT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +62%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • WS
    WE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
2
Farm Training Collective Nyc Inc

The goal of Farm School NYC is to train the next generation of farmers in New York City and beyond, with a focus on limited resourced and socially disadvantaged individuals and communities, and to increase access to healthy, local food in…

Education
3
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
4
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
5
New York City Energy Efficiency Corporation

Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.

Environment
6
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
7
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
8
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
9
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
10
City Growers Inc

Through our original curriculum design that uses innovative growing spaces on rooftop farms, in school gardens, and public parks - city growers fosters a love of nature and encourages nyc youth to consider their place, agency, and future…

Food & Nutrition
11
United Way of New York City

Uwnyc works with a coalition of trusted partners to unite community power with citywide possibility. together, we meet today's most urgent needs while building transformative solutions for tomorrow - striving for health, opportunity, and…

Philanthropy
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Directions for Our Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/110
Grantees still filing
77/110
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: $340,000 · OtherCUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL FOR PUBLIC HEALTHMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC: $240,000 · OtherMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INCSCAN-HARBOR INC: $235,000 · OtherSCAN-HARBOR INCIndividual grant recipient: $205,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $182,500 · OtherYOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICEURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherGREEN GUERILLAS INC: $150,000 · Other+76 more: $1,413,450 · Other+76 moreTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST H…BRONXWORKS INC: $220,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INCQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $200,000 · Human ServicesQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSETHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $180,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOC…RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $150,000 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIVEUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTE…TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesTEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE…+4 more: $89,000 · Human Services+4 moreHARLEM GROWN INC: $152,500 · EnvironmentHARLEM GROWN INCURBAN WILD INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentURBAN WILD INCBK ROT INC: $144,500 · EnvironmentBK ROT INCROCKAWAY WATERFRONT ALLIANCE INC: $140,000 · EnvironmentROCKAWAY WATERFRON…TREES NEW YORK INC: $136,000 · EnvironmentTREES NEW YORK INCCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $109,300 · EnvironmentCOUNCIL ON THE ENV…NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $100,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL…QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $70,000 · EnvironmentQUEENS BOTANICAL G…+3 more: $43,250 · EnvironmentCommunity Food Advocates Inc: $220,000 · Food & NutritionEQUITY ADVOCATES INC: $155,000 · Food & NutritionJUST FOOD: $85,000 · Food & NutritionTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC: $17,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $12,500 · Food & NutritionBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $176,500 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $29,600 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY CHEST OF PORT WASHINGTON NY INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $10,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,500 · PhilanthropyResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $60,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $40,000 · EducationLATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC: $26,000 · EducationLITERACY INC: $25,000 · EducationROBERT A TOIGO FOUNDATION: $18,700 · EducationRED DESK EDUCATION SERVICES INC: $16,500 · EducationTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $7,500 · Education+7 more: $24,500 · EducationLANTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHEAST BROOKLYN HOUSING DEVELOP: $67,029 · Housing & ShelterTHE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD: $55,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,045,950Human Services$1,274,000Environment$1,045,550Food & Nutrition$489,500Philanthropy$234,100Education$218,200Housing & Shelter$212,029

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC: $240,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetSCAN-HARBOR INC: $235,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $225,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $220,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Advocates Inc: $220,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $200,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $180,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $176,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetEQUITY ADVOCATES INC: $155,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetHARLEM GROWN INC: $152,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN GUERILLAS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetURBAN WILD INC: $150,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $150,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBK ROT INC: $144,500 over 7y, 35% of budgetROCKAWAY WATERFRONT ALLIANCE INC: $140,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetTREES NEW YORK INC: $136,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $109,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFamilyCook Community Table Ltd DBA FamilyCook Productions: $101,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $95,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetROCKAWAY YOUTH TASK FORCE INC: $92,500 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetLANTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUST FOOD: $85,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHEAST BROOKLYN HOUSING DEVELOP: $67,029 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD: $55,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $54,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC: $51,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMadison Square Boys and Girls Club Foundation Inc: $47,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY: $40,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $38,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN CITY FORCE INC: $34,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAdded Value & Herban Solutions Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCANDID: $29,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC: $29,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $28,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHORAL SOCIETY INC: $27,500 over 7y, 16% of budgetLATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC: $26,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLITERACY INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NEW YORK INC: $23,400 over 9y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SCAN-HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM GROWN INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREEN GUERILLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN WILD INC ↗
  • Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BK ROT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKAWAY WATERFRONT ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds TREES NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds FamilyCook Community Table Ltd DBA FamilyCook Productions ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKAWAY YOUTH TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JUST FOOD ↗
  • Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST BROOKLYN HOUSING DEVELOP ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
  • Who funds THE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Madison Square Boys and Girls Club Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of New Yor…Pinkerton FoundationLily Auchincloss Foun…Brooklyn Community Fo…The Hyde and Watson F…Robin Hood FoundationThe New York Communit…City Parks Foundation…North Star Fund IncNew York Women's Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Surdna Foundation Inc
United Way of New York CityNY39.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of New York City · Pinkerton Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The New York Community Trust · City Parks Foundation Inc · North Star Fund Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Surdna Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Levitt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Levitt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Shakespeare & Company Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Levitt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home