Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lester & Millie Rosen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$530kFood & Nutrition$225kReligion$185kHealth$110kEnvironment$90kRecreation & Sports$70kArts & Culture$50kAnimals$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$35,000
EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOL$35,000
GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION$35,000
SISTER JOSES WOMENS CENTER$20,000
TUCSON SYNCHRO INC$20,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$15,000
THERAPUTIC RANCH FOR ANIMALS KIDS$10,000
FELICIAS FARM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HARD HITTERS FOR THE KINGDOM INC$10,000
CASA DE LOS NINOS INC$10,000
AZ CHILDRENS ASSOCIATION$10,000
NATIVE SEEDS SOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERE$10,000
TUCSON GIRLS CHORUS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $15k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $15k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $15k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$1.4M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TUCSON SYNCHRO INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +44% · 61% of their budget
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +39%
  • TG
    Tucson Girls Chorus Association Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
  • MV
    MOUNTAIN VIEW UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIS
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
  • LP
    La Paloma Family Services Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
4
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
5
Chicanos Por La Causa Inc Cplc

We drive economic and political empowerment.

Human Services
6
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
7
Goodwill Industries of Southern Az Inc

Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona works toward ensuring that all people have the opportunity to reach their potential and contribute to our community. Through quality, evidence-based, workforce development programs; Goodwill…

—
8
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
9
Tmm Family Services Inc

TMM's mission is to provide quality affordale housing, essential education, and stabiliity for qualifying low-income seniors, single parents, and veterans within the Greater Tucson area.

—
10
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
11
Tucson Investigative Reporting Center Inc

The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.

Animals
12
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOL: $175,000 · OtherEMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $175,000 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INCInterfaith Community Services: $80,000 · OtherInterfaith Community ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSISTER JOSES WOMENS CENTER: $60,000 · OtherSISTER JOSES WOMENS CENTERTHERAPUTIC RANCH FOR ANIMALS KIDS: $50,000 · OtherTHERAPUTIC RANCH FOR ANIMALS KIDSAZ CHILDRENS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherAZ CHILDRENS ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHARD HITTERS FOR THE KINGDOM INC: $40,000 · OtherTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc: $50,000 · OtherTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc+4 more: $50,000 · Other+4 moreCommunity Food Bank Inc: $175,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Ba…FELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFELICIA'S FARM FK…TUCSON SYNCHRO INC: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $65,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS: $30,000 · Human ServicesWatershed Management Group Inc: $50,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED: $40,000 · EnvironmentCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthCASA DE LOS NINOS: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$850,000Food & Nutrition$225,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Human Services$95,000Environment$90,000Health$50,000Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $80,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTUCSON SYNCHRO INC: $70,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $65,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetWatershed Management Group Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS: $30,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLa Paloma Family Services Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON SYNCHRO INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Girls Chorus Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Watershed Management Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds La Paloma Family Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Social Venture Partners Tucson · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Community Food Bank Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lester & Millie Rosen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lester & Millie Rosen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lester & Millie Rosen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph