Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lester & Frances Johnson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.4MHousing & Shelter$345kHuman Services$267kYouth Development$193kAnimals$144kEducation$85kHealth$63kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY$100,000
TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY$40,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
COURAGE CONNECTION$15,000
ANGEL'S WISH$15,000
EASTERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$15,000
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METRO ST LOUIS$15,000
HEALTH BY ALL MEANS$15,000
ST LOUIS PUBLIC RADIO$15,000
AGAPE RANCH$13,000
COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE$10,000
SAINT LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
GLEN-ED PANTRY$10,000
GOOD SHEPARD LUTHERAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $762k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 13%COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF SPRING GREEN: $6k → 9%GLEN-ED PANTRY: $30k → 12%SAFE CONNECTIONS: $5k → 21%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $40k → 7%GLEN-ED PANTRY: $20k → 12%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $40k → 7%GLEN-ED PANTRY: $20k → 12%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $40k → 7%GLEN-ED PANTRY: $10k → 12%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $40k → 7%HOLLY'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $2k → 12%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $30k → 14%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $40k → 7%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $40k → 7%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $30k → 7%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $30k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $20k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $20k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $20k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $100k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $75k → 7%NORTHWEST DANE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 10%NORTHWEST DANE SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $17k → 10%GIO'S GARDEN: $13k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $10k → 10%GIO'S GARDEN: $10k → 10%GIO'S GARDEN: $10k → 10%GIO'S GARDEN: $10k → 10%GIO'S GARDEN: $10k → 10%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY: $7k → 10%GIO'S GARDEN: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
MO
KS
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 36 repeat orgs$374k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
29

Total granted

$2.7M
$237k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

61%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $760k · revenue +153%
  • TM
    TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +30%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $175k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • FR
    FRAXA Research Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +24%
  • SO
    SUPPORT OUR TROOPS - ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS AREA FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
3
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
4
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
5
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
6
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
7
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
8
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
9
Paws Chicago

Paws chicago is a national leader in the no kill animal welfare movement, helping more than 23,842 homeless and at-risk pets each year through comprehensive spay/neuter, medical, and adoption programs.

Animals
10
Rescue Pack

Established in 2016, rescue pack serves communities across the midwest to tackle pet food insecurity by recovering donated surplus pet food and supplies and redistributing them through charitable programs. we partner with animal welfare…

Animals
11
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angel's Wish Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Agape Ranch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOAVES & FISHES: $240,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHESBOY SCOUT AMERICA THREE FIRES COUNCIL: $100,000 · OtherBOY SCOUT AMERICA THREE FIRES COUNCILAUGUSTANA COLLEGE OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT: $80,000 · OtherAUGUSTANA COLLEGE OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENTCHRISTMAS SHOP WITH HEROES AND HELPERS: $65,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS SHOP WITH HEROES AND HELPERSSUPPORT OUR TROOPS: $65,000 · OtherSUPPORT OUR TROOPSST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 · Other+47 more: $498,500 · Other+47 moreTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $760,000 · Food & NutritionTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INCEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $93,500 · Food & NutritionEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANKSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $90,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHER…TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $330,000 · Human ServicesTIMOTHY'S MINISTRYLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $175,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY S…THE GLEN-ED PANTRY: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE GLEN-ED PANTRYSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesSHARING CONNECTIONS INCGIO'S GARDEN INC: $57,500 · Human ServicesGIO'S GARDEN INCWAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC: $34,000 · Human Services+6 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $52,500 · AnimalsANGEL'S WISH INCORPORATED: $15,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · AnimalsAnimal Rescue Corps Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY: $5,000 · AnimalsTINY N TALL RESCUE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentTENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentAGAPE RANCH INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOURAGE CONNECTION: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterDollys Dream Home Rabbit Rescue: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · Health
Other$1,103,500Food & Nutrition$943,500Human Services$761,500Animals$107,500Youth Development$83,500Housing & Shelter$70,500Health$52,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $760,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $330,000 over 9y, 25% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $175,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $93,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLEN-ED PANTRY: $80,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCOURAGE CONNECTION: $65,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGIO'S GARDEN INC: $57,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $52,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC: $34,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE: $27,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAGAPE RANCH INC: $16,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Rescue Corps Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHWEST DANE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF SPRING GRN: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDollys Dream Home Rabbit Rescue: $5,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTINY N TALL RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION OF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORY RIDGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetSAFE CONNECTIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHollys House of Hope Incorporated: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
  • Who funds THE GLEN-ED PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds COURAGE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds SHARING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIO'S GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds THREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127 ↗
  • Who funds WAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds FRAXA Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL'S WISH INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Animal Rescue Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO16.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · Jx Gives Back Family Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Madison Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lester & Frances Johnson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lester & Frances Johnson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lester & Frances Johnson Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lester & Frances Johnson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lester & Frances Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph