Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leross Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$79kHuman Services$52kHealth$32kEnvironment$31kCommunity Improvement$13kArts & Culture$13kEmployment$10kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MITOCHONDRIAL RESEARCH GUILD$6,500
TREEHOUSE$3,000
MARY'S PLACE$2,500
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$2,500
RAZOM$2,500
WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION$2,500
AKIN$2,500
FARESTART$2,500
NATIONAL CASAGAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICINE$2,000
ROUTT COUNTY RIDRS$2,000
AMERICA RIVERS$2,000
WASHINGTON FARMLAND TRUST SEATTLE$2,000
NEW BEGINNINGS$1,500
EDMONDS FOOD BANK$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $2k → 6%WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $3k → 9%WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $2k → 9%WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $2k → 9%WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $2k → 9%WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $2k → 9%AKIN: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 22 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$260k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+5%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TREEHOUSE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +172%
  • NB
    NEW BEGINNINGS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +24%
  • MP
    Maris Place
    6× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • UO
    U OF W FOUNDATION FUNDS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • LU
    Lift Up of Routt County
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
4
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
5
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
6
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
8
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
9
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
10
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
11
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
12
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Home Society of Washington; the most unlike its peers is Routt County Riders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MITOCHONDRIAL RESEARCH GUILD: $79,208 · OtherTHE MITOCHONDRIAL RESEARCH GUILDNEW BEGINNINGS: $13,500 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGSAMERICAN RIVERS NW REGION: $11,750 · OtherAMERICAN RIVERS NW REGIONAMERICAN RIVERS SW REGION: $11,750 · OtherAMERICAN RIVERS SW REGIONUW MEDICINE: $11,500 · OtherUW MEDICINEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherCHILDHAVEN: $7,000 · Other+12 more: $38,500 · Other+12 moreTREEHOUSE: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSEMaris Place: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentMaris PlaceFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $10,500 · HealthSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthWASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $9,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $2,500 · Human ServicesLift Up of Routt County: $2,000 · Human Services350ORG: $7,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentROUTT COUNTY RIDERS: $8,000 · EducationEDMONDS FOOD BANK: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$192,208Youth Development$30,500Health$18,500Human Services$13,500Environment$9,000Education$8,000Food & Nutrition$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTREEHOUSE: $17,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS: $13,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMaris Place: $13,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROUTT COUNTY RIDERS: $8,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEDMONDS FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget350ORG: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFARESTART: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLift Up of Routt County: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COALITION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION ↗
  • Who funds ROUTT COUNTY RIDERS ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDMONDS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
  • Who funds National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lift Up of Routt County ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COALITION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leross Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leross Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leross Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leross Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leross Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph