Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leonard R Catanoso Jr Foundation In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$302kEnvironment$64kScience & Tech$50kFood & Nutrition$44kAnimals$40kHealth$14kYouth Development$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$150,000
REEDS FARM$14,500
NO LIMITS ACADEMY$13,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$11,000
CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE NATIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE SHINE FOUNDATION$5,000
THE NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$3,000
THE TIDELANDS INITIATIVE$3,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$3,000
LOVE OF LINDA CANCER FUND$2,500
THE MARINE MAMAL STRANDING CENTER$2,500
AVA'S VOICE$2,500
THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DE
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 4 repeat orgs$484k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$69k
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+9%

Still filing today

25%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $222k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    REEDS FARM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $44k
  • SF
    SHINE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k
  • AV
    AVA'S VOICE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k

Funded once

  • PS
    PENN STAE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • MO
    MONGABAY ORG CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • CM
    CAPE MAY TECH-NATURAL SCIENCE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
2
Waterbird Society

The waterbird society is composed of biologists, researchers, conservationists, students, and others interested in the behavior, ecology, and conservation of waterbirds. the organization is administered by officers and council members…

—
3
Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.

Animals
4
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
5
Orca Conservancy

Orca conservancy is working on behalf of orcinus orca, the killer whale, and protecting the wild places on which it depends.

Animals
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Wild Orca

Translating science into action to save Southern Resident killer whales from extinction.

Animals
8
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
9
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
10
Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey Inc

Conserve wildlife foundation of new jersey works to preserve rare and at-risk wildlife in new jersey through field science, habitat restoration, education, and public engagement.

Animals
11
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
12
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ava's Voice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYPENN STAE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherPENN STAE UNIVERSITYCAPE MAY TECH-NATURAL SCIENCE: $50,000 · OtherCAPE MAY TECH-NATURAL SCIENCEREEDS FARM: $44,000 · OtherREEDS FARM+10 more: $43,799 · Other+10 moreMONGABAY ORG CORP: $50,000 · EnvironmentMONGABAY ORG…CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA W…+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC: $10,000 · AnimalsMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $7,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF OCEAN CITY INC: $1,000 · AnimalsNO LIMITS ACADEMY INC: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAVA'S VOICE INC: $7,500 · HealthNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$437,799Environment$61,000Animals$18,500Youth Development$13,000Human Services$12,000Health$7,500Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $7,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leonard R Catanoso Jr Foundation In funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leonard R Catanoso Jr Foundation In. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
  • Tri-State Bird Rescue and Research Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leonard R Catanoso Jr Foundation In?

Find your warmest path to Leonard R Catanoso Jr Foundation In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard R Catanoso Jr Foundation In’s filings →

More from the funding graph