Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leonard & Milred Igstaedter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$52kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$46kHuman Services$44kEducation$43kArts & Culture$37kHealth$26kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS BEACH HOUSE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
THE JOSHUA F FREEDMAN FOUNDATION$5,000
THE HARRY K FOUNDATION$5,000
JESSE LEE APS SERVICE PROJECT$5,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$2,500
RIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICES$2,500
PROSPECT THEATER$2,500
PEELER HOLIDAY PROGRAM$2,475
PEELER BACK TO SCHOOL FUND$2,400
CAPE HENLOPEN STUDENT GIFT DRIVE$871
FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Camp Kesem: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CA
VA
DE
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 22 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$340k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+2%

Still filing today

23%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +55%
  • AM
    ANIMAL MANOR INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • DW
    Danbury Women's Center
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GD
    GLOBAL DREAMS USA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CH
    CAPE HENLOPEN FOOD BASKETgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank Network of Somerset County Inc

The organizaton operates daily and weekly food pantries in bridgewater, bound brook, somerville, manville, north plainfield and the va in lyons(all in somerest county, new jersey). the organization meets emergency food needs on a daily…

Food & Nutrition
2
Jersey Strong Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Chester Mendham Food Pantry a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The Chester Mendham Food Pantry provides local families in need with supplemental food and supplies. We have helped over 75 families.

Food & Nutrition
4
Somerset County Mobile Food Bank

To provide food assistance in the local community

Food & Nutrition
5
Williams & Dollard Community Development Corporation

Subsidized/Low to Moderate Income Real Estate Development Social Services

Education
6
Community Food Pantry

Provide supplemental food and toiletries to persons with limited incomes in Kent County, Maryland.

Human Services
7
Ocean County Hunger Relief Inc

Ocean county hunger relief, inc. provides emergency food and clothing assistance for the needy people of ocean county. the four day food package provided is intended as a stop gap measure, to give people time to obtain help from family,…

—
8
Keyport Ministerium Food Pantry Inc

Distribute food and other necessities to the needy.

Food & Nutrition
9
Family Promise of Cape May County

To provide shelter, meals and case management for homeless families, as well as aiding the families in finding a home , family services and training.

Human Services
10
Center Harbor Soup Kitchen Inc

To provide quality, nutritional meals to needy families in center harbor.

Food & Nutrition
11
Harvest House

Food Security

Human Services
12
Chester Area Christian Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & aid for people in need

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of Delaware Inc; the most unlike its peers is Animal Manor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC: $30,300 · OtherCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INCJESSE LEE APS Service Project: $30,000 · OtherJESSE LEE APS Service ProjectTBICO: $19,530 · OtherTBICOIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPeeler Holiday Program: $17,985 · OtherPeeler Holiday ProgramRIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICES: $16,920 · OtherRIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICESIMMANUEL SHELTER INC: $16,241 · OtherIMMANUEL SHELTER INCPEELER BACK TO SCHOOL FUND: $15,940 · OtherPEELER BACK TO SCHOOL FUNDMolly Ann Tango Foundation: $15,000 · OtherPROSPECT THEATER: $12,500 · Other+13 more: $40,369 · Other+13 moreHARRY K FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationHARRY K FOUN…ANIMAL MANOR INC: $15,000 · AnimalsJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,737 · EnvironmentCAPE HENLOPEN FOOD BASKET: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 · Food & NutritionCamp Kesem National: $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC: $636 · Community Improvement
Other$282,785Education$40,000Animals$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Environment$8,737Food & Nutrition$5,500Human Services$1,000Community Improvement$636

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARRY K FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC: $30,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIMMANUEL SHELTER INC: $16,241 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetANIMAL MANOR INC: $15,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,737 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC: $636 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARRY K FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMANUEL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE HENLOPEN FOOD BASKET ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Carl M Freeman Foundation IncDE19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leonard & Milred Igstaedter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leonard & Milred Igstaedter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Joshua M Freeman Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • Children's Beach House Inc: 5% of income from government
  • West Side New Beginnings Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Harry K Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Cape Henlopen Food Basket: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard & Milred Igstaedter’s filings →

More from the funding graph