Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leonard & Milred Igstaedter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$52kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$46kHuman Services$44kEducation$43kArts & Culture$37kHealth$26kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS BEACH HOUSE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
THE HARRY K FOUNDATION$5,000
JESSE LEE APS SERVICE PROJECT$5,000
THE JOSHUA F FREEDMAN FOUNDATION$5,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$2,500
PROSPECT THEATER$2,500
RIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICES$2,500
PEELER HOLIDAY PROGRAM$2,475
PEELER BACK TO SCHOOL FUND$2,400
CAPE HENLOPEN STUDENT GIFT DRIVE$871
FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Camp Kesem: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CT
CA
VA
DE
TN
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$340k · 22 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$340k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-16%

Still filing today

23%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +55%
  • AM
    ANIMAL MANOR INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • DW
    Danbury Women's Center
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GD
    GLOBAL DREAMS USA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CH
    CAPE HENLOPEN FOOD BASKETgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank Network of Somerset County Inc

The organizaton operates daily and weekly food pantries in bridgewater, bound brook, somerville, manville, north plainfield and the va in lyons(all in somerest county, new jersey). the organization meets emergency food needs on a daily…

Food & Nutrition
2
Jersey Strong Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Chester Mendham Food Pantry a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The Chester Mendham Food Pantry provides local families in need with supplemental food and supplies. We have helped over 75 families.

Food & Nutrition
4
Somerset County Mobile Food Bank

To provide food assistance in the local community

Food & Nutrition
5
Williams & Dollard Community Development Corporation

Subsidized/Low to Moderate Income Real Estate Development Social Services

Education
6
Community Food Pantry

Provide supplemental food and toiletries to persons with limited incomes in Kent County, Maryland.

Human Services
7
Ocean County Hunger Relief Inc

Ocean county hunger relief, inc. provides emergency food and clothing assistance for the needy people of ocean county. the four day food package provided is intended as a stop gap measure, to give people time to obtain help from family,…

8
Keyport Ministerium Food Pantry Inc

Distribute food and other necessities to the needy.

Food & Nutrition
9
Family Promise of Cape May County

To provide shelter, meals and case management for homeless families, as well as aiding the families in finding a home , family services and training.

Human Services
10
Center Harbor Soup Kitchen Inc

To provide quality, nutritional meals to needy families in center harbor.

Food & Nutrition
11
Harvest House

Food Security

Human Services
12
Chester Area Christian Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & aid for people in need

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of Delaware Inc and the most unlike its peers is Animal Manor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC — $30,300 · OtherCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INCJESSE LEE APS Service Project — $30,000 · OtherJESSE LEE APS Service ProjectTBICO — $19,530 · OtherTBICOIndividual grant recipient — $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPeeler Holiday Program — $17,985 · OtherPeeler Holiday ProgramRIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICES — $16,920 · OtherRIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICESIMMANUEL SHELTER INC — $16,241 · OtherIMMANUEL SHELTER INCPEELER BACK TO SCHOOL FUND — $15,940 · OtherPEELER BACK TO SCHOOL FUNDMolly Ann Tango Foundation — $15,000 · OtherPROSPECT THEATER — $12,500 · Other+13 more — $40,369 · Other+13 moreHARRY K FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationHARRY K FOUN…ANIMAL MANOR INC — $15,000 · AnimalsJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $8,737 · EnvironmentCAPE HENLOPEN FOOD BASKET — $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC — $500 · Food & NutritionCamp Kesem National — $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC — $636 · Community Improvement
Other$282,785Education$40,000Animals$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Environment$8,737Food & Nutrition$5,500Human Services$1,000Community Improvement$636

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARRY K FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC — $30,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIMMANUEL SHELTER INC — $16,241 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetANIMAL MANOR INC — $15,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $8,737 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCamp Kesem National — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC — $636 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARRY K FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC
  • Who funds IMMANUEL SHELTER INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL MANOR INC
  • Who funds JOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds CAPE HENLOPEN FOOD BASKET
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National
  • Who funds WEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Carl M Freeman Foundation IncDE19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leonard & Milred Igstaedter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc26% of income from government
  • Joshua M Freeman Foundation20% of income from government
  • Children's Beach House Inc5% of income from government
  • West Side New Beginnings Inc2% of income from government
  • Harry K Foundation2% of income from government
  • Cape Henlopen Food Basket0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph