How much did LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST reported 27 grants totaling $25,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST based?

LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST is based in MO.

LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST

This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.

$25k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$2k

Largest

01What you fund

0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$45kHealth$11kFood & Nutrition$9kYouth Development$5kReligion$5kEducation$4kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$49k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

greatervalleyyoungchristian

2022

lehigh valley

2023

ministriescommitteelehigh valley

2024

holychildrensyoungchristianchurchlehigh valley

2025

youngchristianlehigh valley

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$688k

Total assets

Largest grants

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$2,000
CAMELOT FOR CHILDREN$1,000
DESALES UNIVERSITY$1,000
PROJECT OF EASTON INC$1,000
SAFE HARBOR EASTON INC$1,000
GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN$1,000
BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH HOMES INC$1,000
FAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON INC$1,000
MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT$1,000
NEW BETHANY INC$1,000
GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK$1,000
#502 BOY SCOUTS$1,000
THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND$1,000
KIDSPEACE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC$1,000
ALLENTOWN AREA ECUMENICAL FOOD BANK$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$111k · 31 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$111k

$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+18%

Still filing today

81%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthReligionCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AA
ALLENTOWN AREA ECUMENICAL FOOD BANK
5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +37%
CF
CENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +45%
CF
CAMELOT FOR CHILDREN
4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +39%

Funded once

MS
MERCY SPECIAL LEARNING CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $2k
KC
KIDSPEACE CORP
one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +18%
WL
WHOLE LIFE CENTER
one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

Dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals.

Human Services

Pathways to Housing - Pa

We provide homes, restore health & reclaim lives for chronically homeless people with disabilities.

Housing & Shelter

Youth Homes

The mission of youth homes is to help every youth feel safe, have a sense of belonging, and find a place to call home.

Human Services

Elijah Family Homes

Elijah family homes provides stable housing and support services for families seeking recovery.

Housing & Shelter

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh

Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…

Human Services

Shalom House

Our mission is to empower women and transform lives.

—

Pathways Pa Inc

To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…

Human Services

Transitions of Pa

Transitions is a crisis center that provides advocacy, empowerment, and education to victims, survivors, families, and communities to end patterns of violence and abuse.

Human Services

Trinity House Apartments Inc

To provide affordable, supportive communities for older adults with a resolve to nurture a spirit of purpose, wellness, and harmony among both our residents and colleagues.

Human Services

Family Services of Western Pennsylvania

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational care.as a member organization of wesley family services (wfs), family services of western pa (fswp) supported services that promote recovery and resiliency at more than…

Human Services

Bethanna

Bethanna is a christian organization that provides the highest quality system of care for children and families in order to ensure safety, restore emotional wellness, and build family stability.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kidspeace Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

258/3,153

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/33

Grantees still filing

30/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$54,000Human Services$45,000Health$11,000Food & Nutrition$9,000Youth Development$5,000Religion$5,000Education$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA52.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · The Rider-Pool Foundation · Harry C Trexler Estate · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S · Ppl Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · Charles a and Leona K Gruber Fnd

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 843351840 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Leona Gruber Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Leona Gruber Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Leona Gruber Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

LEONA GRUBER CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Leona Gruber Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph