· Private foundation
Leon H & Clymene M Bond Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of LEON H & CLYMENE M BOND FDN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $183k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS | $81,000 |
| OCONTO GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION | $51,500 |
| NURSE'S NOOK OF OCONTO COUNTY | $50,000 |
| BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC | $25,000 |
| OCONTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $19,130 |
| OCONTO WRESTLING CLUB | $10,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $5,000 |
| MY BROTHER'S KEEPER | $5,000 |
| EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS | $5,000 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN | $2,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| SAFE KIDS - OCONTO COUNTY | $2,500 |
| OCONTO HIGH SCHOOL | $1,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2022–2025 · $115k · revenue +262%
- TLTHE LAKES COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC2× · 2023–2024 · $99k · revenue +47%
- OCOCONTO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $66k · revenue +155%
Funded once
- OCOCONTO COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIALone grant, 2023 · $50k
- LCLAKES COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2024 · $50k
- C8CESA 8one grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Service for disabled adults
Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…
The adrc of brown county supports older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers through education, advocacy, and resources. we connect people to answers, in our center, by phone, or at home, so everyone can live with diginity and…
A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…
To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.
The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.
Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.
Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Encompass Early Education & Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rainbow House Domestic Abuse Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAKES COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MY BROTHERS KEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC ↗
- Who funds OCONTO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Oconto County Commission On Aging INC ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM COME INC ↗
- Who funds ABRAMS SPOTLIGHT PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Live Like Ava Inc ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Robert and Betty Meyer Family Foundation · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leon H & Clymene M Bond Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leon H & Clymene M Bond Fdn?
Find your warmest path to Leon H & Clymene M Bond Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.