Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$768k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.3MEducation$2.3MHealth$466kArts & Culture$68kPhilanthropy$50kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $425k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH$250,000
ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY$200,000
COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER$75,000
HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN$50,000
THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH$50,000
HAYS ARTS COUNCIL$33,000
DIOCESE OF SALINA$25,000
HAYS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC$15,000
FIRST CARE CLINIC$10,000
HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN$5,000
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $55k → 13%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $25k → 13%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $259k → 14%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $25k → 13%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $250k → 14%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $25k → 13%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $250k → 14%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $25k → 13%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $250k → 14%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $25k → 13%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $250k → 14%DIOCESE OF SALINA: $20k → 13%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $227k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $200k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $200k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $200k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $200k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $200k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $200k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $200k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $200k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $200k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $159k → 14%ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $150k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $100k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $100k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $100k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $86k → 14%COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $75k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $50k → 14%HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $50k → 14%HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $50k → 14%HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $50k → 14%HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $50k → 14%HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $50k → 14%FIRST CARE CLINIC: $50k → 14%COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $50k → 14%HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $50k → 14%FIRST CARE CLINIC: $50k → 14%COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $50k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $50k → 14%HAYS ARTS COUNCIL: $33k → 14%COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $30k → 14%THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH: $25k → 14%COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $25k → 14%FIRST CARE CLINIC: $24k → 14%MARY ELIZABETH MATERNITY HOME: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 10 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$5.1M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+236%

Still filing today

40%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    Hays Medical Center Foundation
    6× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +107%
  • FC
    First Care Clinic Inc
    4× · 2018–2025 · $134k · revenue +158%
  • HA
    HAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +834%

Funded once

  • VC
    VICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +88%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF CENTRAL PLAINS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +236%
  • AH
    AMERICAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF GERM
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hays Area Chamber of Commerce

The hays area chamber of commerce will be the catalyst for bringing the business community together with other organizations and the community at large to keep the hays area viable; to foster a better business climate; and promote a higher…

—
2
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
3
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
4
Hays Area Childrens Center Inc

To serve and advance quality care and educational experiences for young children.

Education
5
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
6
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
7
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
8
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
9
Mahaska Hospital Foundation

Assist mahaska county hospital d/b/a mahaska health partnership in the process of providing healthcare to mahaska county.

Health
10
East Texas Community Health Services Inc

Operate a primary health care clinic for the care and treatment of sick, injured, afflicted, infirm, disabled or destitute.

—
11
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
12
Crete Area Health Care Foundation

To solicit and raise funds for the benefit of the crete area medical center.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Hays State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mary Elizabeth Maternity Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH INC: $2,254,094 · OtherTHOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH INCST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $1,858,625 · OtherST THOMAS MORE SOCIETYCOMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $230,000 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SALINA: $215,000 · Other+6 more: $105,000 · OtherHays Medical Center Foundation: $305,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Salina Community Foundation: $50,000 · PhilanthropyFirst Care Clinic Inc: $133,500 · HealthFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education
Other$4,662,719Philanthropy$355,000Health$133,500Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHays Medical Center Foundation: $305,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetFirst Care Clinic Inc: $133,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGreater Salina Community Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC: $43,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARY ELIZABETH MATERNITY HOME INC: $25,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetVICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF CENTRAL PLAINS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hays Medical Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds First Care Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds Greater Salina Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARY ELIZABETH MATERNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF CENTRAL PLAINS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Salina Community FoundationKS21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Salina Community Foundation · Robert E and Patricia Schmidt Foundation · Dane G Hansen Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling’s filings →

    More from the funding graph