· Private foundation
Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of LEO J DREILING & ALBINA DREILING CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $425k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH | $250,000 |
| ST THOMAS MORE SOCIETY | $200,000 |
| COMEAU CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER | $75,000 |
| THOMAS MORE PREP-MARIAN HIGH | $50,000 |
| HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN | $50,000 |
| HAYS ARTS COUNCIL | $33,000 |
| DIOCESE OF SALINA | $25,000 |
| HAYS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC | $15,000 |
| FIRST CARE CLINIC | $10,000 |
| HAYS MEDICAL CENTER FDN | $5,000 |
| FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHays Medical Center Foundation6× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +107%
- FCFirst Care Clinic Inc4× · 2018–2025 · $134k · revenue +158%
- HAHAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC2× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +834%
Funded once
- VCVICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +88%
- TATHE ARC OF CENTRAL PLAINS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +236%
- AHAMERICAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF GERMone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The hays area chamber of commerce will be the catalyst for bringing the business community together with other organizations and the community at large to keep the hays area viable; to foster a better business climate; and promote a higher…
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.
To serve and advance quality care and educational experiences for young children.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.
To provide medical care to the uninsured.
Assist mahaska county hospital d/b/a mahaska health partnership in the process of providing healthcare to mahaska county.
Operate a primary health care clinic for the care and treatment of sick, injured, afflicted, infirm, disabled or destitute.
To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ
To solicit and raise funds for the benefit of the crete area medical center.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Hays State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mary Elizabeth Maternity Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hays Medical Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds First Care Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds Greater Salina Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARY ELIZABETH MATERNITY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds VICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF CENTRAL PLAINS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Salina Community Foundation · Robert E and Patricia Schmidt Foundation · Dane G Hansen Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Leo J Dreiling & Albina Dreiling Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.