Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lenz Edward and June Char Tr 71504

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$982k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$487kArts & Culture$429kYouth Development$426kCrime & Legal$413kEducation$285kPhilanthropy$180kHuman Services$169kPublic Benefit$165kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $792k
$48,696
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARDEEVILLE BOYS CLUB INC$160,000
PARDEEVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$152,535
ADRC OF COLUMBIA COUNTY$100,000
GREATER PORTAGE YOUTH EDUCATION FDN$78,985
PORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$77,765
PARDEEVILLE DISTRICT AMBULANCE SERVICE$63,000
PORTAGE CENTER FOR THE ART INC$60,000
RIVER HAVEN HOMELESS SHELTER$50,000
CANOPY CENTER INC$50,000
PARDEEVILLE BULLDOG SUPPORT FOUNDATION$48,696
Individual grant recipient$30,000
PORTAGE RECOVERY CENTER INC$25,000
PORTAGE SERVICE CLUB ASSOCIATION$18,275
Individual grant recipient$17,000
COLUMBIA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NORTHWOOD INC OF WISCONSIN: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 21 repeat orgs$878k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$2.5M
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

48%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $497k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PORTAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $396k · revenue +80% · 46% of their budget
  • PA
    PORTAGE AREA COMMUNITY CHARITABLE TRUST
    5× · 2018–2022 · $180k · revenue +176% · 70% of their budget
  • RH
    RIVER HAVEN HOMELESS SHELTER INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $63k · revenue +46% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of West Central
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • SM
    SAINT MARY OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portage Area Jt Recreation Commission
Recreation & Sports
2
Portage Youth Basketball Incorporated

We are a youth basketball league that runs from March thru November for children in grade level kindergarten thru 12th grade

Recreation & Sports
3
Portage Parks and Recreation Foundation Inc

To promote and assist the portage parks department

Recreation & Sports
4
Portage County Youth On Ice Inc

Promote and develop youth hockey in portage county, to provide a recreational and socially healthy outlet for youth up to and including high school ages and to help direct the participating youth into responsible life choices.

Recreation & Sports
5
Portage Athletic Booster Club

Provide support for athletics at portage township school

Recreation & Sports
6
Portage Soccer Club

Promote development of amateur soccer players

Recreation & Sports
7
Portage Library Association

Public library services

Education
8
Portman Recreation Association

Provide opportunity for local youth to learn and play organized hockey.

—
9
Portage County Big Brothers and Big
Youth Development
10
Portage Swimming

To support coaching staff and swimmers of the portage aquatic club.

Recreation & Sports
11
Portage County Public Library Foundation Inc

The portage county public library foundation, inc. manages contributions and bequests to benefit the patrons of the portage county library.

Education
12
Portage Muskies Hockey Boosters Inc

To encourage & support the hockey program of portage public schools through the contribution of time, materials, monies, knowledge and skill.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Portage Youth Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arlington Curling Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $435,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientADRC OF COLUMBIA COUNTY: $210,600 · OtherADRC OF COLUMBIA COUNTYCOLUMBIA COUNTY CASA INC: $200,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA COUNTY CASA INCPARDEEVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $152,535 · OtherPARDEEVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTBoys & Girls Clubs of West Central: $150,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Clubs of West CentralCITY OF PORTAGE: $130,845 · OtherCITY OF PORTAGEPORTAGE YOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC: $91,326 · OtherPORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $77,765 · Other+23 more: $635,278 · Other+23 morePORTAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $395,500 · Arts & CulturePORTAGE CENTE…GREATER PORTAGE YOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $196,062 · Youth DevelopmentPORTAGE TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentPARDEEVILLE BOYS CLUB INC: $160,000 · Recreation & SportsPORTAGE CURLING ASSOCIATION INC: $49,390 · Recreation & SportsPORTAGE SERVICE CLUB ASSOCIATION: $18,275 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsPORTAGE AREA COMMUNITY CHARITABLE TRUST: $180,000 · PhilanthropyPARDEEVILLE BULLDOG SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $148,874 · EducationCANOPY CENTER INC: $100,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,083,349Arts & Culture$395,500Youth Development$236,062Recreation & Sports$228,665Philanthropy$180,000Education$148,874Crime & Legal$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPORTAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $395,500 over 4y, 46% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY CASA INC: $200,000 over 5y, 92% of budgetGREATER PORTAGE YOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $196,062 over 6y, 73% of budgetPORTAGE AREA COMMUNITY CHARITABLE TRUST: $180,000 over 5y, 70% of budgetPARDEEVILLE BULLDOG SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $148,874 over 5y, 23% of budgetCANOPY CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetRIVER HAVEN HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $62,500 over 2y, 26% of budgetKINSHIP MENTORING OF COLUMBIA COUNTY INC: $62,500 over 3y, 40% of budgetPORTAGE RECOVERY CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPORTAGE CURLING ASSOCIATION INC: $49,390 over 5y, 72% of budgetPORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 1 TRUST: $43,000 over 3y, 76% of budgetPORTAGE TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC: $40,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetNORTHWOODS INC OF WISCONSIN: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArlington Curling Club: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORTAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PORTAGE YOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE AREA COMMUNITY CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PARDEEVILLE BOYS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PARDEEVILLE BULLDOG SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANOPY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE YOUTH BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER HAVEN HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP MENTORING OF COLUMBIA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE CURLING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 1 TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE SERVICE CLUB ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS INC OF WISCONSIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI24.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lenz Edward and June Char Tr 71504 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lenz Edward and June Char Tr 71504. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lenz Edward and June Char Tr 71504’s filings →

    More from the funding graph