Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lent Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$260kHuman Services$78kCivil Rights$47kEducation$47kInternational$35kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$5kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$3,800
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
21 WILBERFORCE GLOBAL FREEDOM CENTER$25,000
CONVERGE$21,200
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC$15,000
LOVE THY NERD INC$10,000
ISAIAH 117 HOUSE$3,800
TEACHBEYOND INC$3,000
OPEN DOOR RECOVERY HOUSE$3,000
RIPE FOR HARVEST WORLD OUTREACH$2,100
PCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIES$1,200
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPEN DOOR RECOVERY HOUSE: $3k → 9%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $30k → 18%AUTHENTIC INTIMACY CORPORATION: $8k → 13%OPEN DOOR RECOVERY HOUSE: $3k → 9%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $4k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Lent Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lent Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$421k · 15 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$421k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+73%

Still filing today

47%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ISAIAH 117 HOUSE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +27%
  • LT
    Love Thy Nerd
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +70%
  • WO
    WORLD ORPHANS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $27k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • K
    KINGSPORCH
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TA
    THE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • TB
    TEXAS BAPTIST MEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
2
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
3
Freedom That Lasts Ministries

Ftlm seeks to equip churches to minister to those who are suffering from addiction and equip christians with the resources needed to facilitate spiritual growth in christlike character and biblical wisdom.

Human Services
4
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
5
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
6
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
7
Elijah List Ministries Inc

A religous organization performing charitable acts and teachings related to the bible.

Religion
8
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
9
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
10
Docusen Ministries

Preaching, teaching, writing and traveling ministry for the docusen family to serve christian churches and organizations.

Religion
11
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
12
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Orphans; the most unlike its peers is Love Thy Nerd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $74,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTCONVERGE: $68,450 · OtherCONVERGEKINGSPORCH: $50,000 · OtherKINGSPORCHBETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $40,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARYPIONEERS: $30,000 · OtherPIONEERSRELIANT MISSION INC: $30,000 · OtherRELIANT MISSION INCWORLD ORPHANS: $26,500 · OtherWORLD ORPHANSTHE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherTHE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCHTEXAS BAPTIST MEN INC: $15,000 · Other+7 more: $36,350 · Other+7 moreISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $33,800 · Human ServicesISAIAH 117 HOUSELove Thy Nerd: $30,000 · Human ServicesLove Thy NerdAUTHENTIC INTIMACY CORPORATION: $8,300 · Human ServicesAUTHENTIC INTIMA…OPEN DOOR RECOVERY HOUSE: $6,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR RECOVE…21 WILBERFORCE GLOBAL FREEDOM CENTER: $47,000 · Religion21 WILBERFOR…Training Leaders International: $7,500 · ReligionTraining Lea…YIELDED EVANGELICAL SERVANTS INC: $5,000 · ReligionYIELDED EVAN…RISEN MOTHERHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 · ReligionTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $8,300 · InternationalMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS: $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$395,300Human Services$78,100Religion$62,000International$8,300Housing & Shelter$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget21 WILBERFORCE GLOBAL FREEDOM CENTER: $47,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $33,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLove Thy Nerd: $30,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetWORLD ORPHANS: $26,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUTHENTIC INTIMACY CORPORATION: $8,300 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $8,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $8,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTraining Leaders International: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR RECOVERY HOUSE: $6,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetYIELDED EVANGELICAL SERVANTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRISEN MOTHERHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 21 WILBERFORCE GLOBAL FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Love Thy Nerd ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds AUTHENTIC INTIMACY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EXODUS ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS ↗
  • Who funds Training Leaders International ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR RECOVERY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds YIELDED EVANGELICAL SERVANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds RISEN MOTHERHOOD MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL17.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Tyndale House Ministries · Servant Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lent Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lent Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lent Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lent Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lent Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph