Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lemon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$225kHousing & Shelter$178kEducation$152kReligion$127kHuman Services$89kAnimals$12kFood & Nutrition$9kPhilanthropy$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEATS FOR KIDS$50,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$25,000
WHIZ KID OF OKLAHOMA$20,000
ACTS 2 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,300
KIDS ACROSS AMERICA$15,000
PROJECT TRANSFORMATION$10,000
OKLAHOMA CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC$5,000
SKYLINE CHURCH INC$5,000
EDMOND SANTA FE HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ST PAUL SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$2,500
DINNER WITH LOVE FOUNDATION$2,000
CROSS POINT CAMP RETREAT$2,000
TWIN CEDARS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $262k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $50k → 16%CITY CARE: $18k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $35k → 16%CITY CARE: $15k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $25k → 16%CITY CARE: $15k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $25k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $25k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $20k → 16%INFANT CRISES SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISES SERVICES INC: $9k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISES SERVICES INC: $3k → 16%INFANT CRISES SERVICES INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$776k · 25 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$776k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+20%

Still filing today

48%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +85%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +82%
  • CC
    CITY CARE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $48k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -121%
  • FF
    FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +110%
  • LL
    LUCKY LAB RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Human Services
2
Oklahoma Lions Boys Ranch Inc dba Lions Meadows of Hope

We unite brothers and sisters in foster care, surround them with a community of hope, and help them grow into caring and productive adults.

Human Services
3
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
4
PAUSE4PAWS Inc

Pause4Paws promotes access to healthcare for pet owners in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, metro area impacted by homelessness, mental illness, or addiction who need inpatient treatment but have no one to care for their pets.

Health
5
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
6
Citizens Caring for Children

Citizens caring for children breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for oklahoma foster children by addressing their material, emotional, intellectual and spiritual needs...because every child deserves the chance for a better life. through…

—
7
The Pet Food Pantry of Oklahoma City Inc

Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…

Animals
8
Oklahoma Paws Memphis Street Animal Rescue

To assist in the ongoing battle of pet overpopulation in Oklahoma by offering a no kill shelter environment, responsible adoption, medical aid, and community outreach. We also intend to provide sanctuary to companion animals who's people…

Animals
9
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Ok Foundation

Serving the needs of the whole child, including education, safety, environment, health, and well-being.

Philanthropy
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Oklahoma County Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as responsible, caring, and productive citizens.

Youth Development
12
The Toby Keith Foundation Inc

To encourage the health and happiness of pediatric cancer patients by soliciting public support in order to operate the "ok kids korral". this state of the art facility provides temporary housing for families of pediatric cancer patients…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $180,000 · Human ServicesCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATIONCITY CARE INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INCINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC+2 more: $13,500 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATIONACTS 2 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50,300 · OtherACTS 2 UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCROSS POINT CAMP RETREAT: $24,000 · OtherCROSS POINT CAMP RETREATSKYLINE CHURCH: $22,650 · OtherSKYLINE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOKLAHOMA METHODIST CONFERENCE: $15,000 · OtherEDMOND SANTA FE HIGH SCHOOL: $13,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATIN IN: $12,000 · OtherST PAUL SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $10,500 · Other+18 more: $57,000 · Other+18 morePOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORROWS I…KIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $51,000 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationWhiz Kids of Oklahoma Inc: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTWIN CEDARS INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$275,000Other$281,450Youth Development$150,000Religion$51,000Education$47,000Housing & Shelter$27,500Recreation & Sports$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $51,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $48,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $33,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $27,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhiz Kids of Oklahoma Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIMPACT OKLAHOMA INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDINNER WITH LOVE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOONER GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARD TRANSITIONS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUCKY LAB RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalvary Baptist Ministries Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Whiz Kids of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds DINNER WITH LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SOONER GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO LIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD TRANSITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CEDARS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY LAB RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Calvary Baptist Ministries Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Bowen Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Servant Foundation · Hudiburg Family Foundation Inc Attn David Hudiburg · Wilshire Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lemon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lemon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lemon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph