Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leggott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$152kCommunity Improvement$30kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$10kInternational$10kReligion$9kHuman Services$2kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STOCK FARM GREATER RIVALLI FOUNDATION$10,000
THE LEARNING ALLIANCE$10,000
CROSSOVER MISSION$5,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF AUBURN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISONSIN LA CROSEE$5,000
CENTRAL BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$3,070
HAMILTON FOREVER FUND$1,000
ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
IA
OH
VA
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Leggott Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Leggott Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 13 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$176k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+40%

Still filing today

62%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RAVALLI COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +10%
  • SM
    ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +2%
  • CC
    CARROLL COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
2
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
3
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
6
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
9
Trinity College

To expand on the mission statement made on page 1, trinity's core mission values and characteristics emphasize: 1)commitment to the education of women in a particular way through the design and pedagogy of the historic undergraduate…

Education
10
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
11
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission; the most unlike its peers is Ravalli County Economic Development Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSEWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONMANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherMANKATO STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISONCENTRAL BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $9,370 · OtherCENTRAL BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYUNIVERSITY OF WISONSIN LA CROSEE: $5,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AUBURN: $5,000 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $3,357 · OtherSTOCK FARM GREATER RAVALLI FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSTOCK FARM GREATER RAVALLI FOU…ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $12,000 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXASCARROLL COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCARROLL COLLEGETHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INCLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $9,522 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INCRAVALLI COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $30,000 · Community ImprovementRAVALLI COUNTY …CROSSOVER MISSION INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 · InternationalALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$112,727Education$61,522Community Improvement$30,000Youth Development$10,000International$10,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAVALLI COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $30,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetSTOCK FARM GREATER RAVALLI FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $9,522 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $9,370 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $357 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAVALLI COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds STOCK FARM GREATER RAVALLI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leggott Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leggott Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leggott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph