Skip to content

· Public charity

Legal Services NYC

LEGAL SERVICES NYC is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$6.2MHousing & Shelter$1.6MRecreation & Sports$940kHuman Services$588kEmployment$222kCommunity Improvement$206k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $711k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$149,628
Median grant
1
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGAL AID SOCIETY$1,075,836
MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$587,724
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ADVOCACY RIGHTS$185,676
NEW SETTLEMENT APARTMENTS$169,699
URBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE BOARD INC$149,628
COMMUNITY VOICES HEARD$105,113
FLATBUSH DEVELOPMENT CORP$100,781
MET COUNCIL RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL FUND INC$49,388
HOUSING COURT ANSWERS INC$34,764
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $588k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $588k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 7 repeat orgs$669k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$9.1M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $622k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +44%
  • UH
    URBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +125%
  • NS
    NEW SETTLEMENT COMMUNITY CAMPUS CORP
    6× · 2019–2024 · $940k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • NB
    Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +125%
  • JI
    JustFix Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue -50%
  • PB
    PRO BONO NET INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Services Nyc

Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

Crime & Legal
2
Manhattan Legal Services

Manhattan legal services is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
3
New York Housing Conference Inc

NYHCs mission is to advance City, State and Federal policies and funding to support the development and preservation of decent and affordable housing for all New Yorkers. NYHC is a nonprofit affordable housing policy and advocacy…

Housing & Shelter
4
New York Apartment Association Inc

Nyaa provides services to landlords including computerized rent registration of rent stabilized apartments with the new york state division of housing and community renewal in compliance with nys & nyc laws & regulations.

—
5
Cnyc Inc (Council of New York Cooperatives & Condominiums)

Support housing cooperatives and condominiums

—
6
Neighbors Helping Neighbors Inc

Nhn promotes racial justice while empowering low and moderate-income new yorkers to fight for, secure and maintain quality housing and build financial assets. nhn is a hud-certfied counseling agency based in brooklyn, new york.

Housing & Shelter
7
Housing Rights Initiative

To help tenants stand up for their legal rights.

Housing & Shelter
8
New York State Tenants & Neighbors Information Ser

The organization provides education, training, tenant organizing guidance and promotion of social welfare and quality of life in New York, primarily in the area of affordable housing.

Community Improvement
9
Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation a

Brooklyn legal services corporation a (dba. build up justice nyc) wields community-focused civil legal services to confront injustice. we work to ensure all new yorkers have equal access to legal services to seek justice, make their voices…

—
10
Sebco Development Inc

Sebco development inc. is a non profit community based organization committed to developing and maintaining affordable and safe housing in the city of new york. sebco strives to continually provide well maintained, secure housing along…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Legal Aid Society of Northeastern New York Inc

The legal aid society of northeastern new york fights for fairness, dignity, and justice for those living in poverty and for a society which is inclusive and equitable for all. we transform lives, build community and empower people by…

Crime & Legal
12
Lsny-Bronx Corporation

Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Court Answers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center for Disability Advocacy Rights Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $5,221,375 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETYCENTER FOR DISABILITY ADVOCACY RIGHTS INC: $923,287 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR DISABILITY ADVOCACY RIGHTS INC+1 more: $7,500 · Crime & LegalURBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC: $1,136,378 · Housing & ShelterURBAN HOMESTEADING …Met Council Research & Education Fund Inc: $478,416 · Housing & ShelterMet Council Researc…+2 more: $43,764 · Housing & ShelterNEW SETTLEMENT COMMUNITY CAMPUS CORP: $940,324 · Recreation & SportsNEW SETTLE…METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $587,724 · Human ServicesCommunity Voices Heard Inc: $222,209 · EmploymentFLATBUSH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $175,781 · Community ImprovementNorthwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Inc: $30,000 · Community Improvement
Crime & Legal$6,152,162Housing & Shelter$1,658,558Recreation & Sports$940,324Human Services$587,724Employment$222,209Community Improvement$205,781

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $5,221,375 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC: $1,136,378 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetNEW SETTLEMENT COMMUNITY CAMPUS CORP: $940,324 over 6y, 23% of budgetCENTER FOR DISABILITY ADVOCACY RIGHTS INC: $923,287 over 6y, 98% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $587,724 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMet Council Research & Education Fund Inc: $478,416 over 6y, 28% of budgetCommunity Voices Heard Inc: $222,209 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetFLATBUSH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $175,781 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHOUSING COURT ANSWERS INC: $34,764 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNorthwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJustFix Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRO BONO NET INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Star Fund IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Star Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Fund for the City of New York Inc · New York Foundation · The Ford Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legal Services NYC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legal Services NYC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Legal Services NYC?

    Find your warmest path to Legal Services NYC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Legal Services NYC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph