Skip to content

· Private foundation

Legal Horizons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$156kInternational$151kCivil Rights$26kSocial Science$2kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$2kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Int Ctr for Transitional Justice$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Lawyers for American Democracy: $2k → 11%PAIR Project: $2k → 16%American Friends: $2k → 22%Center for Reproductive Rights: $5k → 17%Janes Due Process: $3k → 10%Frontera: $3k → 27%Sentencing Project: $3k → 14%Southern Pov Law Center: $2k → 18%Amnesty International: $2k → 14%PBS: $1k → 7%VT Legal Aid: $1k → 10%Center for Reproductive Rights: $3k → 17%Sentencing Project: $3k → 14%Amnesty International: $1k → 14%Center for Reproductive Rights: $3k → 17%Sentencing Project: $2k → 14%Center for Reproductive Rights: $2k → 17%Sentencing Project: $1k → 14%Marshall Project: $5k → 17%National Public Radio: $1k → 14%Marshall Project: $2k → 17%Marshall Project: $1k → 17%Brennan Center: $2k → 17%Marshall Project: $1k → 17%Brennan Center: $1k → 17%Marshall Project: $1k → 17%Brennan Center for Justice: $1k → 17%Safe Passage Project: $1k → 17%Cyrus R Vance Ctr for Intl Justice: $10k → 17%Cyrus R Vance Ctr for Intl Justice: $5k → 17%Cyrus R Vance Ctr for Intl Justice: $5k → 17%NYCBA Justice Center: $2k → 17%City Bar Justice Ctr: $2k → 17%NYCBA Justice Center: $2k → 17%NYCBA Justice Center: $2k → 17%Int Ctr for Transitional Justice: $100k → 17%International Center for Transition: $25k → 17%International Center for Transition: $25k → 17%International Center for Transition: $25k → 17%International Center for Transition: $25k → 17%International Center for Transition: $25k → 17%International Center for Transition: $10k → 17%Human Rights First: $5k → 17%Human Rights First: $2k → 17%National Ctr for Law and Econ Justi: $1k → 17%Human Rights First: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
RI
VA
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$224k · 11 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$224k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
0%

Still filing today

64%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCivil RightsCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • TS
    THE SENTENCING PROJECT
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +129%
  • PP
    Prison Policy Initiative
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -12%
  • F
    Frontera
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Justice and International Law

To contribute to the full enjoyment of human rights in the americas through effective use of the tools of the inter-american system and international human rights law

Crime & Legal
2
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
3
The Promise of Justice Initiative

The promise of justice initiative works to create positive change for people in the criminal legal system at the intersection of impact litigation, direct services and community engagement.

Crime & Legal
4
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
5
World Justice Project

The world justice project (wjp) is a non-profit organization, incorporated in the state of washington with its headquarters in washington, d.c. an office in mexico city. wjp is an independent, multidisciplinary organization working to…

Crime & Legal
6
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
7
The Public Interest Law Center

The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…

Crime & Legal
8
Arizona Capital Representation Project

ACRP is a non-profit legal services organization that assists indigent persons facing the death penalty and sentenced to death in Arizona through direct representation, pro-bono consulting services and training for capital defense…

—
9
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
10
Immigrant Justice Corps Inc

Ijc's mission is to recruit, train, and populate the immigration field with the highest quality legal advocates to create a new generation of leaders with a lifelong commitment to immigrant justice.

Crime & Legal
11
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
12
Abolitionist Law Center

Legal services & public interest law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sentencing Project; the most unlike its peers is Prison Policy Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE INC: $135,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE INCHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $13,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $8,000 · InternationalInt Ctr for Transitional Justice: $100,000 · OtherInt Ctr for Transitional JusticeCyrus R Vance Ctr for Intl Justice: $20,000 · OtherCyrus R Vance Ctr for Intl JusticeTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $8,000 · OtherNYCBA Justice Center: $6,000 · Other+10 more: $18,580 · Other+10 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsPrison Policy Initiative: $6,000 · Civil RightsJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementPOLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Crime & LegalSAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION: $1,000 · Crime & LegalASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC: $2,000 · Social ScienceNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,000 · Education
International$156,000Other$152,580Civil Rights$20,500Community Improvement$10,000Crime & Legal$3,000Social Science$2,000Arts & Culture$1,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPrison Policy Initiative: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST ↗
  • Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Prison Policy Initiative ↗
  • Who funds JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds POLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legal Horizons Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legal Horizons Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Legal Horizons Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Legal Horizons Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Legal Horizons’ filings →

    More from the funding graph