Skip to content

· Private foundation

Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$975k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$17MHuman Services$11MHealth$7.5MYouth Development$5.8MEducation$5.4MPublic Benefit$3.7MHousing & Shelter$2.8MReligion$2.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $955k
  • $250k+13 grants · $7.1M
$358,858
Median grant
1
States reached
$142M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CE$975,000
DISCOVER ROME AREA FAMILY TRAILS$938,992
SOUTH WOOD CO HUMANE SOCIETY$800,000
RAPIDS AREA SOCCER INC$566,000
AGING & DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER$525,935
Individual grant recipient$500,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS CO$500,000
VILLAGE OF PORT EDWARDS$500,000
CITY OF WISCONSIN RAPIDS$360,000
WOOD COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$358,858
HISTORIC POINT BASSE INC$350,000
WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC$250,000
WOOD COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DPT$160,400
WOOD COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DPT$160,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $710k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAP SERVICES INC: $25k → 10%JEREMIAHS CROSSING INC: $250k → 11%JEREMIAH'S CROSSING: $85k → 11%THREE BRIDGES RECOVERY WISCONSIN I: $150k → 11%LOVE INC OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY INC: $200k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$56M · 32 repeat orgs$9.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
23

Total granted

$56M
$6.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+7%

Still filing today

41%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +37%
  • OD
    OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +14%
  • AH
    ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $900k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • MP
    MARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2.2M
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M
  • CO
    CITY OF WISCONSIN RAPIDS - MCMILLAN
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeast Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Obtain and manage land of ecological significance.

Environment
2
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
3
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
4
Wisconsin Housing Preservation Corp

Whpc acquires, preserves and develops low-income and affordable housing in wisconsin. the majority of the housing is subsidized through the u.s. department of housing and urban development, u.s.d.a. rural development, federal and state…

Housing & Shelter
5
Wisconsin Youth Company Inc

Wisconsin youth company's mission is to engage youth in opportunities to encourage them to be their best selves.

—
6
Underdog Pet Rescue of Wisconsin Inc

Underdog pet rescue is an all-breed companion animal rescue and vet clinic based out of dane county, wisconsin. our mission is to find permanent homes for animals in need and to enrich lives by strengthening the connection between animals…

Animals
7
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
8
Central Wisconsin Community Action Council Inc

The mission of central wisconsin community action council, inc. (cwcac) is to provide opportunities for services which help low-income individuals and families within our service area achieve self-sufficiency and independence.

Human Services
9
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…

Housing & Shelter
10
Our Wisconsin Revolution Inc

To promote the common good and general welfare of the people of wisconsin.

Civil Rights
11
Wisconsin Council of the Blind and Visua

The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…

Health
12
Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc

To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mary's Place Boarding House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WISCONSIN RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11,431,400 · OtherWISCONSIN RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CE: $9,375,000 · OtherJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WISCONSIN RAPI: $4,700,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WISCONSIN RAPICITY OF WISCONSIN RAPIDS: $3,680,821 · OtherCITY OF WISCONSIN RAPIDSJOHN E ALEXANDER SOUTH WOOD COUNTY: $3,250,000 · OtherJOHN E ALEXANDER SOUTH WOOD COUNTY+44 more: $18,050,313 · Other+44 moreASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC: $4,475,000 · HealthASPIRUS R…ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 · HealthASPIRUS H…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 · EducationMARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC: $2,165,000 · Housing & ShelterOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $2,146,000 · EmploymentDISCOVER ROME AREA FAMILY TRAILS CORPORATION: $938,992 · Recreation & SportsWISCONSIN RAPIDS YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC: $332,000 · Recreation & SportsCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $267,500 · Recreation & SportsJEREMIAH'S CROSSING INC: $335,000 · Human ServicesLOVE INC OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHREE BRIDGES RECOVERY WISCONSIN INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesCAP SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$50,487,534Health$5,375,000Education$3,000,000Housing & Shelter$2,165,000Employment$2,146,000Recreation & Sports$1,538,492Human Services$710,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC: $4,475,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $2,146,000 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetWISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC: $740,535 over 4y, 15% of budgetRAPIDS AREA SOCCER INC: $671,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $650,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetHANNAH CENTER INC: $530,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC: $346,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetJEREMIAH'S CROSSING INC: $335,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetWHEELS OF INDEPENDENCE INC: $272,099 over 3y, 26% of budgetCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $267,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetLOVE INC OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY INC: $200,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC: $180,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL: $180,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY: $100,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetSOUTH WOOD COUNTY RECREATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCAP SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVER ROME AREA FAMILY TRAILS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPIDS AREA SOCCER INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC POINT BASSE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH'S CROSSING INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELS OF INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPIONS4KIDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Woodtrust Charitable Foundation IncWI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Incourage Community Foundation Inc · Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc · Jasperson Family Foundation Inc · Seramur Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc?

    Find your warmest path to Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph