Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lee & Patti Schear Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$300kMembership Benefit$250kHealth$210kArts & Culture$190kReligion$151kInternational$63kSocial Science$14kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$461k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREAT DAYTON$125,000
JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE$50,000
DAYTON PERFORMING ARTS ALLIANCE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%DAYBREAK: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$551k · 7 repeat orgs$750k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$551k
$600k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyMembership BenefitInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SINAI SCHOLARS INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $175k · revenue -90% · 41% of their budget
  • JL
    JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $110k
  • UO
    University of Dayton
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • DH
    DAYTON HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $165k · revenue +28%
  • JC
    JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue +86% · 27% of their budget
  • M
    MAYANOT
    one grant, 2017 · $118k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
University of Miami
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Dooher Institute of Physics and Energy Inc
Recreation & Sports
7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
10
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
Marian University

To be a great catholic university dedicated to excellence in learning, achieved by teaching, research, & scholarly activities in franciscan & liberal arts tradition.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dayton Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Sinai Scholars Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREAT DAYTON — $125,000 · OtherJEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREAT DAYTONMAYANOT — $118,000 · OtherMAYANOTJEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE INC — $110,000 · OtherJEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL — $100,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICALMIAMI VALLEY MIKVAH INC — $36,554 · OtherMIAMI VALLEY MIKVAH INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $25,000 · Other+4 more — $23,300 · OtherDAYTON HISTORY — $165,000 · Arts & CultureDAYTON HISTORYDayton Performing Arts Alliance — $25,000 · Arts & CultureDayton Performin…SINAI SCHOLARS INC — $175,000 · PhilanthropySINAI SCHOLARS …JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON — $125,000 · Membership BenefitJEWISH CEM…University of Dayton — $100,000 · EducationUniversity…University of Miami — $25,000 · EducationUniversity…DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $52,500 · HealthTHE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $62,500 · InternationalDAYBREAK INC — $2,500 · Human Services
Other$537,854Arts & Culture$190,000Philanthropy$175,000Membership Benefit$125,000Education$125,000Health$82,500International$62,500Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSINAI SCHOLARS INC — $175,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetDAYTON HISTORY — $165,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON — $125,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetUniversity of Dayton — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $52,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDayton Performing Arts Alliance — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAYBREAK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SINAI SCHOLARS INC
  • Who funds DAYTON HISTORY
  • Who funds JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON
  • Who funds University of Dayton
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds THE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds Dayton Performing Arts Alliance
  • Who funds DAYBREAK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dayton Foundation DepositoryOH15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · The Berry Family Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lee & Patti Schear Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lee & Patti Schear Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lee & Patti Schear Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph