· Public charity
Ledc
To leverage Latino influence and economic strength to fuel collective prosperity.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| South High School | $2,680 |
| Freedomtainment | $2,500 |
| Barrientos Scholarship Foundation | $2,500 |
| POC Collaborative Community Resource Center | $675 |
| Child Savings Institute | $250 |
| Habitat for Humanity Omaha | $250 |
| Omaha by Design | $250 |
| Leukemia & Lumphoma Society | $150 |
| High Hopes Foundation Inc | $150 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocacy of policies to support Nebraskans.
Founded in 2020, partners for livable omaha is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing the livability of communities throughout the omaha metro.partners for livable omaha (livable omaha) partners with organizations,…
The organization's mission is to create, recruit, grow and retain technology and bioscience businesses in northeast kansas with the ultimate vision to build a more modern, resilient and diverse regional economy.
None
America achieves is devoted to advancing economic and educational opportunity, mobility, and pathways to good jobs and careers, including for low- and moderate-income and other underserved communities.
We inspire thinkers from different disciplines to combine their efforts for a common purpose: healthcare innovation.(continued on schedule o)from bioinformatics to cancer research and beyond, we stimulate collaboration and help bring…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FREEDOMTAINMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BARRIENTOS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POC COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds OMAHA BY DESIGN ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH HOPES FOUNDATION INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Weitz Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ledc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ledc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ledc?
Find your warmest path to Ledc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Ledc’s filings →