Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leaving Legacies Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$924kPhilanthropy$363kHuman Services$268kEducation$233kAnimals$126kYouth Development$59kReligion$24kRecreation & Sports$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $97k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIORS$96,652
SAFE PLACE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$30,000
SAFE PLACE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$14,000
SAFE PLACE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CADEN INGRAM FOUNDATION: $41k → 11%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 9%DYING DEFIANTLY: $33k → 15%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
TN
NC
SC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$449k · 5 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
39

Total granted

$449k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $408k · revenue +3%
  • AC
    ANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $14k · revenue +13%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TUG MCGRAW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $191k · revenue -59% · 78% of their budget
  • TG
    THE GUY FIERI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $166k · revenue +121% · 50% of their budget
  • AG
    A GLIMMER OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $111k · revenue -5% · 28% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
2
Pittsburgh Cure Sarcoma

Fund awareness and research for sarcoma

Health
3
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
4
Pittsburgh Melanoma Foundation

To raise awareness of the prevention of melanoma

Health
5
Shadyside Hospital of Pittsburgh
6
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
7
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
8
It's About the Warriors Foundation

To assist and empower all post 9/11 veterans and their families from the tri-state area, regardless if they have been wounded or have been deployed, with our various programs thus, leading them to a successful and enriched life.

Public Benefit
9
The Pittsburgh Promise Foundation

The pittsburgh promise promotes high educational aspirations among urban youth, funds scholarships for post-secondary access, and fuels a prepared and diverse regional workforce.

Philanthropy
10
University of Pittsburgh and Upmc Medical and Health Sciences Foundation

The mission of the medical & health sciences foundation is to integrate private fundraising for the entire academic medical center which comprises the six health sciences schools of the university of pittsburgh, upmc, upmc hillman cancer…

Philanthropy
11
Phillips-Amick Foundation for Cancer Research

At the phillips-amick foundation for cancer research, we envision a future where medical breakthroughs are commonplace and accessible to all. we strive to make a positive impact on the lives of patients and their families through our work…

Health
12
Warrior Kids Foundation
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pittsburgh Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dying Defiantly Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Veteran Support ServicesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Animal Rescue and AdoptionJewish Community FederationsChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersYmca Community CentersHomeless Services & ShelterYouth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%12%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%68%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $408,291 · HealthNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDAT…A GLIMMER OF HOPE INC — $110,848 · HealthA GLIMMER OF HOPE INCSafe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — $56,000 · HealthSafe Place and Rape Crisis Center…ANGEL FOUNDATION — $22,142 · Health+1 more — $11,000 · HealthTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $344,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONTHE TUG MCGRAW FOUNDATION — $190,779 · PhilanthropyTHE TUG MCGRAW FOUNDATION+2 more — $15,203 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIORS — $96,652 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED…SOWW FOUNDATION MYRTLE BEACH SC — $96,652 · OtherSOWW FOUNDATION MYRTLE BEA…PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) — $90,000 · OtherPRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSO…SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIOR — $89,000 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED…Individual grant recipient — $17,440 · OtherSoldier's Wish — $25,161 · Other+21 more — $62,526 · Other+21 moreTHE GUY FIERI FOUNDATION — $165,616 · EducationTHE GUY FIER…TIKVA CORP — $27,939 · EducationTIKVA CORPUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,050 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…CADEN INGRAM FOUNDATION INC — $40,962 · Human ServicesDYING DEFIANTLY INC — $32,732 · Human ServicesSWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,035 · Human ServicesTHE CAMERON HEYWARD FOUNDATION INC — $36,918 · Youth DevelopmentWith God All Things Are Possible — $23,308 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $12,361 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT K9 HERO — $28,835 · Animals
Health$608,281Philanthropy$549,982Other$477,431Education$218,605Human Services$84,729Youth Development$72,587Animals$28,835

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $408,291 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $344,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TUG MCGRAW FOUNDATION — $190,779 over 1y, 78% of budgetTHE GUY FIERI FOUNDATION — $165,616 over 1y, 50% of budgetA GLIMMER OF HOPE INC — $110,848 over 1y, 28% of budgetPRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) — $90,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSafe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — $56,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCADEN INGRAM FOUNDATION INC — $40,962 over 1y, 52% of budgetTHE CAMERON HEYWARD FOUNDATION INC — $36,918 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO — $28,835 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTIKVA CORP — $27,939 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSoldier's Wish — $25,161 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWith God All Things Are Possible — $23,308 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANGEL FOUNDATION — $22,142 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC — $13,505 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $12,361 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMCGUIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $7,915 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBest of the Batch Foundation — $7,288 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC — $1,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH — $1,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMON VALLEY YMCA INC — $630 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Eqt Foundation · Steelers Charities · Centimark Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leaving Legacies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leaving Legacies Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Leaving Legacies Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph