Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leathers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$102kReligion$82kPublic Benefit$10kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$9kAnimals$8kHealth$8kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIN ART & GARDEN$20,000
CORTE MADERA COMMUNITY CENTER$8,890
MIDSUMMER MUSICAL RETREAT$5,000
ROSS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ROSS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC$2,500
ROTACARE BAY AREA$2,500
ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION$2,000
MARIN SYMPHONY$1,000
MARIN ROSE SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $500 → 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $300 → 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $300 → 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $300 → 8%ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSN: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
NV
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 16 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$260k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TOWN OF ROSS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • EF
    ENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +525%
  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • ST
    SOUNDS TRUE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • TW
    THE WORK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +130%
  • AB
    American Bird Conservancy
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Tmt International Observatory Llc

Tmt international observatory (tio) was founded by the members listed below exclusively to further charitable, educational and scientific purposes and, within such limits, to advance scientific knowledge and education through the study,…

Science & Tech
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
Rare

Rare inspires change so people and nature thrive.

Environment
5
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
California Association for Research in Astronomy

To advance the frontiers of astronomy and share our discoveries with the world. the two 10-meter telescopes of keck observatory are the world's largest optical and infrared telescopes. they have revolutionized our understanding of the…

Science & Tech
8
Russian-American Science Association Corp

Maintain strengthen and develop common intellectual and cultural space of the russianspeaking scientific community

—
9
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
12
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIN ART & GARDEN: $101,100 · OtherMARIN ART & GARDENTHE GANGAJI FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherTHE GANGAJI FOUNDATIONCORTE MADERA COMMUNITY CENTER: $11,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB: $9,100 · Other+19 more: $50,400 · Other+19 moreOPEN CIRCLE CENTER INC: $30,000 · ReligionOPEN CIRCLE…SOUNDS TRUE FOUNDATION: $10,300 · Public BenefitTHE WORK FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $2,680 · Arts & CultureMARIN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureTOWN OF ROSS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION: $8,250 · Community ImprovementENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC: $5,500 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Conservancy: $2,500 · AnimalsRoss School Foundation: $6,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $250 · Education
Other$227,490Religion$30,000Public Benefit$10,300Arts & Culture$8,780Community Improvement$8,250Animals$8,000Education$6,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GANGAJI FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetOPEN CIRCLE CENTER INC: $30,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetSOUNDS TRUE FOUNDATION: $10,300 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTOWN OF ROSS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION: $8,250 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoss School Foundation: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WORK FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetMIDSUMMER MUSICAL RETREAT SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $2,680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTACARE BAY AREA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARIN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE TAHOE SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GANGAJI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN CIRCLE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUNDS TRUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOWN OF ROSS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Ross School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE WORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDSUMMER MUSICAL RETREAT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ROSS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds ROTACARE BAY AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LAKE TAHOE SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leathers Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leathers Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leathers Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leathers Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leathers Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph