How much did LEARN FRESH EDUCATION CO grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of LEARN FRESH EDUCATION CO’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

middlesteam-based renovations

2020

infrastructure respectiverespective purchasepurchase technologytechnology curriculumcurriculum materialsmaterials spacespace refurbishment

2021

infrastructure respectiverespective purchasepurchase technologytechnology curriculumcurriculum materialsmaterials spacespace refurbishment

2022

infrastructure respectiverespective purchasepurchase technologytechnology curriculumcurriculum materialsmaterials spacespace refurbishment

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

$10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$50k–250k2 grants · $150k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HARLEM$100,000
ECCSD BOARD OF EDUCATION$50,000
AVANTE GARDE ACADEMY$25,000
BGC OF SW MISSOURI$25,000
BGC OF SANTA MONICA$25,000
JOHN P PARKER SCHOOL$10,000
CARVER STEM ACADEMY$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Academy for Global Citizenship

Agc is a chicago public charter school serving students from kindergartern through eighth grade

Education

Bronx Charter School

Bronx charter school for better learning provides its students with a solid foundation for academic success, through achievements that exceeds citywide averages and meets or exceeds new york state standards and national norms in all…

Education

Academy of the City Charter School

We are a community based charter school based on many principles. our students will become independent thinkers, lifelong learners, and responsible members of the community.

Education

The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To enable youth to realize and develop their full potential as citizens in a global society.

—

Washington Global Public Charter School

A community school open to all middle school students in washington, dc, that utilizes a rigorous, internationally based academic and cultural curriculum that integrates project-based learning, service-learning, technology, and language…

Education

The Boys and Girls Clubs

Boys & girls clubs of metropolitan baltimore (bgcmb) provides youth development programs and services for youth ages 6 to 18 during the critical out-of-school time hours. our nine club locations are community-based and led by paid,…

Youth Development

Capital City Public Charter School Inc

The organization's mission is to enable a diverse group of children to meet high expectations, develop creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and achieve a deep understanding of complex subjects, while acquiring a love of…

Education

Boys & Girls Clubs

To enable youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development

Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The club is a voluntary organization which provides educational, athletic and social services to children and teens throughout palm beach county, florida.

Youth Development

Boys and Girls Club of the Suncoast Inc

Providing daily access to a safe place, caring mentors, & high-impact programs

—

Boys & Girls Clubs of the

Provide a safe, caring, and fun environment for youth to learn, grow, and prepare for a great future.

Youth Development

Boys and Girls Clubs

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Southeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

8/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$615,000Youth Development$150,000Education$55,000Human Services$25,000International$25,000Religion$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Round It Up America IncCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Round It Up America Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LEARN FRESH EDUCATION CO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BGC OF SW MISSOURI.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +92% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 430817669 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BGC OF SW MISSOURI, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Learn Fresh Education Co?

Find your warmest path to Learn Fresh Education Co through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LEARN FRESH EDUCATION CO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Learn Fresh Education Co?

More from the funding graph

LEARN FRESH EDUCATION CO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Learn Fresh Education Co?

More from the funding graph