Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lcpv Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
91
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it funds
0156% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$1.9MHuman Services$163kEducation$124kPhilanthropy$69kHealth$47kArts & Culture$45kPublic Benefit$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k55 grants · $192k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $632k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $303k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$5,200
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$259,990
OJC FUND$103,000
Individual grant recipient$100,330
CONG BETH JACOB CHESED$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$44,687
Individual grant recipient$35,000
Individual grant recipient$33,200
REFUAH HELPLINE$29,883
BAIS BRUCHA$27,545
Individual grant recipient$26,364
YESHIVA OHR TORAH$25,180
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KEREN HALBUSHA: $500 → 14%BONEI OLAM: $334 → 14%GEMACH OF JACKSON: $360 → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $122 → 11%EIM LEAH INC: $18k → 11%EIM LEAH INC: $10k → 11%EIM LEAH INC: $5k → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $2k → 11%EIM LEAH INC: $2k → 11%A TIME: $709 → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $5k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $780 → 20%LEV WITH LOVE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NJ
CT
CA
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 78 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
211

Total granted

$2.7M
$719k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+7%

Still filing today

15%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $661k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +73%
  • LB
    LEV BEREL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +7%
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SARAH FAIGA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • M
    MISC
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Keren Otzar Hachaim Inc

To further religious jewish education for children and young adults in israel both directly, by using advanced education methods, and indirectly, by supporting the development of future teachers by subsidizing their education and training.…

Education
2
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
6
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
7
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
8
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
9
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
10
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
11
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
12
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lev with Love Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 343 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
21/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OJC FUND: $569,822 · OtherOJC FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $259,990 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SARAH FAIGA INC: $250,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SARAH FAIGA INCIndividual grant recipient: $192,010 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $172,792 · OtherCONG KHAL LEV SIMCHA: $124,267 · Other+163 more: $2,111,992 · Other+163 moreLEV BEREL INC: $32,000 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $31,700 · ReligionMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $29,000 · ReligionUSA OUTREACH: $25,000 · ReligionYad L Talmid: $21,000 · ReligionZECHER AVROHOM INC: $10,000 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $7,200 · Religion+2 more: $6,000 · ReligionSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE: $32,000 · EducationTHE OJC FUND: $26,000 · EducationCHEDER SHIRAS HATORAH INC: $16,932 · EducationBNOS SARAH INC: $12,847 · EducationYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $5,000 · EducationBACK ON TRACK FUNDING INC: $4,360 · Education+3 more: $7,140 · EducationEIM LEAH INC: $35,201 · Human ServicesAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $2,570 · Human Services+2 more: $2,164 · Human ServicesREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $31,683 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,800 · HealthKESHER NAFSHI INC: $1,280 · HealthFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $8,000 · Arts & CulturePINSK KARLIN INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyKeren Ezra Memitzuka Inc: $1,800 · PhilanthropyVYAZREIM INC: $1,800 · Public Benefit
Other$3,680,873Religion$161,900Education$104,279Human Services$45,435Health$35,763Arts & Culture$8,000Philanthropy$6,300Public Benefit$1,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEIM LEAH INC: $35,201 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE: $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $31,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $31,683 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $29,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYad L Talmid: $21,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCHEDER SHIRAS HATORAH INC: $16,932 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBNOS SARAH INC: $12,847 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON TRACK FUNDING INC: $4,360 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSHALVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $3,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $2,570 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINSK KARLIN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $2,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALMUD TORAH YESODEI HATORAH INC: $1,760 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKESHER NAFSHI INC: $1,280 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,114 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLev with Love Inc: $1,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EIM LEAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE ↗
  • Who funds LEV BEREL INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY72.3× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · M & M Fischer Foundation · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jmg Foundation · The Strasbourg Foundation · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lcpv Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lcpv Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Talmud Torah Yesodei Hatorah Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
  • Nachlas Bais Yaakov: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lcpv Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lcpv Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 343 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lcpv’s filings →

More from the funding graph