Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lawrence and Karen Levinson Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Lawrence and Karen Levinson Charitable Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to President And Fellows Of Harvard College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Lawrence and Karen Levinson Charitable Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $110k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
1
18
2
19
4
20
4
21
7
22
6
23
2
24
2
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Health$147kEducation$82kInternational$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$78k
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$159k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETTERHUMANS INC$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,800
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$1,500
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$1,500
OPERATION SMILE$1,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000
GIVE THE KIDS THE WORLD VILLAGE$1,000
11TH HOUR RESCUE$750
ROSEMARIES RESCUE RANCH INC$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2k → 11%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $50k → 8%LIFESPAN RESEARCH INSTITUTION: $10k → 8%LIFESPAN EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $2k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 14%GIVE THE KIDS THE WORLD VILLAGE: $1k → 13%HUMAN AGE REVERSAL PROJECT: $25k → 13%BETTERHUMANS INC: $100k → 19%ST JUDE: $5k → 17%11TH HOUR RESCUE: $750 → 4%OPERATION SMILE: $2k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%THE PENNINGTON SCHOOL: $5k → 11%SETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $25k → 16%OPERATION SMILE INC: $2k → 10%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%SENS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $250 → 11%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $500 → 7%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%SENS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%ST VINCENTS NURSING HOME: $3k → 16%ST VINCENTS NURSING HOME: $1k → 16%ST VINCENTS NURSING HOME: $1k → 16%ST VINCENTS NURSING HOME: $1k → 16%BANYAN SCHOOL: $250 → 16%ST VINCENT'S NURSING HOME AUXILIARY INC: $250 → 16%RESCUE HAVEN: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 9 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$81k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+38%

Still filing today

56%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GARDEN ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +21%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    4× · 2019–2023 · $9k · revenue +213%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • HA
    HUMAN AGE REVERSAL PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -19% · 33% of their budget
  • TP
    The Pennington Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

7
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation Inc

To provide the diabetes research institute with the funding to cure diabetes now.

Health
8
Buck Institute for Research On Aging

To increase the healthy, productive years of life through basic biomedical research on aging and age-related diseases.

Social Science
9
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
10
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETTERHUMANS INC — $100,000 · HealthBETTERHUMANS INCLifespan Research Institution — $20,000 · HealthLifespan Research InstitutionLIFESPAN EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthLIFESPAN EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATIONTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $9,300 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $6,900 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $50,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harv…GARDEN ACADEMY INC — $30,000 · EducationGARDEN ACADEMY INC+1 more — $1,750 · EducationSETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $25,000 · OtherSETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOO…HUMAN AGE REVERSAL PROJECT INC — $25,000 · OtherHUMAN AGE REVERSAL PROJECT I…ST VINCENTS NURSING HOME — $6,000 · OtherST VINCENTS NURSING HOMEThe Pennington School — $5,000 · OtherThe Pennington SchoolST JUDE — $5,000 · OtherST JUDEMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION — $3,300 · Other+8 more — $8,500 · Other+8 moreOPERATION SMILE INC — $2,000 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$146,700Education$81,750Other$77,800International$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETTERHUMANS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN ACADEMY INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN AGE REVERSAL PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetLifespan Research Institution — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFESPAN EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $9,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $6,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pennington School — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBANYAN SCHOOL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lawrence and Karen Levinson Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lawrence and Karen Levinson Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence and Karen Levinson Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph