Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lavoie Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$294kFood & Nutrition$96kHuman Services$70kEducation$53kEnvironment$46kHealth$23kReligion$20kInternational$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM$21,000
Individual grant recipient$12,830
BARNSTEAD FOOD PANTRY$6,000
END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HOLY FAMILY ACADEMY$4,000
FAITH ALIVE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$4,000
LEDYARD FOOD PANTRY$4,000
LEDYARD CHAIN$3,666
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
RAVEN GAEL BLAISDELL FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BEAR PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%HUDSON VALLEY FREE FLYERS: $1k → 16%SPARK MAKERSPACE: $2k → 9%SPARK MAKERSPACE: $1k → 9%SPARK MAKERSPACE: $1k → 9%GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $5k → 7%SPARK MAKERSPACE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CT
UT
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$652k · 27 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
41

Total granted

$652k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+16%

Still filing today

33%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +55%
  • LC
    LEDYARD CHAIN INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +6%
  • E6
    END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • FL
    Francestown Land Trust Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +39%
  • PC
    PACE CAREER ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -76%
  • PC
    PARADE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
2
The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis

The mission of the green mountain club is to make the vermont mountains play a larger part in the life of the people by protecting and maintaining the long trail system and fostering, through education, the stewardship of vermont's hiking…

—
3
The Center for Wildlife

Center for wildlife's mission is to cultivate and strengthen relationships between humans, wildlife, and the environment resulting in a healthier, more sustainable community. to this end, we focus on three goals: 1. strengthen our…

Animals
4
New England Animal Health Inc
Science & Tech
5
Greater New Haven Cat Project Inc

Gnhcp's mission is to end the suffering of homeless cats through the practice of trap/neuter/return (tnr), and also to educate the community ethically about the importance of animal welfare. our primary goal is to provide the low-income…

Animals
6
Greenwich Hospital

To provide healthcare services.

Health
7
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
8
New England Animal Sanctuary Inc

The purpose of new england animal sanctuary inc. (referred to herein as the corporation) is to engage in charitable and educational activities, as well as activities for the prevention of cruelty to animals, within the meaning of section…

Animals
9
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
10
Friends of the New Haven Animal Shelter

To rescue, rehabilitate and permanently rehome stray/abused animals within the greater new haven ct area.

Animals
11
Connecticut Resource Conservation & Dev Area Inc

The mission of connecticut resource conservation & development area, inc. ("ct rc&d") is to enrich local communities by cultivating agricultural viability, conserving natural resources, and growing economies.

Environment
12
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc; the most unlike its peers is Snipitnh. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $140,577 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $43,543 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBARNSTEAD FOOD PANTRY: $43,500 · OtherBARNSTEAD FOOD PANTRYHOLY FAMILY ACADEMY: $32,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY ACADEMYLEDYARD FOOD PANTRY: $29,676 · OtherLEDYARD FOOD PANTRYTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $14,000 · Other+44 more: $103,883 · Other+44 moreLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $212,300 · AnimalsLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INCLEDYARD CHAIN INC: $21,666 · AnimalsLEDYARD CHAIN INC+4 more: $6,591 · AnimalsFrancestown Land Trust Inc: $15,000 · EnvironmentBEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $11,200 · EnvironmentGRAYLAG NATURE PRESERVE INC: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentWAYPOINT: $14,500 · Human ServicesGRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $5,000 · Human ServicesSpark Makerspace Co: $4,500 · Human ServicesHUDSON VALLEY FREE FLYERS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER: $17,605 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,020 · HealthGranite VNA Inc: $1,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $250 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 · HealthGarde Arts Center Inc: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$407,179Animals$240,557Environment$32,200Human Services$25,000Food & Nutrition$17,605Health$3,520Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $212,300 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetLEDYARD CHAIN INC: $21,666 over 6y, 10% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER: $17,605 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFrancestown Land Trust Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetWAYPOINT: $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $11,200 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPACE CAREER ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGRAYLAG NATURE PRESERVE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpark Makerspace Co: $4,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2,091 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouth East Connecticut Community Center of the Blind Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetGarde Arts Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF: $1,500 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetNEW LONDON MARITIME SOCIETY INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,020 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGranite VNA Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTIOCYTOSIS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetD ACRES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSNIPITNH: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVALONIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEGROWN NATIONAL PARK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY FREE FLYERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds LEDYARD CHAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds Francestown Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds BEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS ↗
  • Who funds PACE CAREER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GRAYLAG NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
  • Who funds Spark Makerspace Co ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds South East Connecticut Community Center of the Blind Inc ↗
  • Who funds Garde Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds BECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON MARITIME SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH21.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Chelsea Groton Foundation · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Edward and Mary Lord Foundation · Dime Bank Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lavoie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lavoie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Thames Valley Council for Community Action Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Avalonia Land Conservancy Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Garde Arts Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lavoie Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lavoie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lavoie’s filings →

More from the funding graph